Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shono, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nakatani, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shono, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nakatani, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 6 825-829
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Comparison of 1% and 2% lidocaine epidural anaesthesia combined with sevoflurane general anaesthesia utilizing a constant bispectral index

A. Shono, S. Sakura*, Y. Saito, K. Doi and T. Nakatani

Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane Medical University, 89–1 Enya-cho, Izumo City 693–8501, Japan

*Corresponding author. E-mail: ssakura@med.shimane-u.ac.jp

Background. The authors compared the effects of epidural anaesthesia with lidocaine 1% and lidocaine 2% on haemodynamic variables, sevoflurane requirements, and stress hormone responses during surgery under combined epidural/general anaesthesia with bispectral index score (BIS) kept within the range 40–50.

Methods. Thirty-three patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into two groups to receive lidocaine 1% or 2% by epidural with sevoflurane general anaesthesia. Sevoflurane was adjusted to achieve a target BIS of 40–50 during maintenance of anaesthesia with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen. Measurements included the inspired (FISEVO) and the end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations (E'SEVO), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) before surgery and every 5 min during surgery for 2 h. Plasma samples were taken immediately before and during surgery for measurements of catecholamines, cortisol, and lidocaine.

Results. During surgery, both groups were similar for HR, BP and BIS, but FISEVO and E'SEVO were significantly higher and more variable with lidocaine 1% than with 2%. Intraoperative plasma concentrations of epinephrine and cortisol were found to be higher with lidocaine 1% as compared with 2%.

Conclusions. To maintain BIS of 40–50 during combined epidural/general anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery, sevoflurane concentrations were lower and less variable with lidocaine 2% than with 1%. In addition, the larger concentration of lidocaine suppressed the stress hormone responses better.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 825–9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M.-K. Yum, J.-T. Kim, and H.-S. Kim
Increased non-stationarity of heart rate during general anaesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane in children
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 772 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Li, S. Zhu, and M. Yan
Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia (Ropivacaine 0.375%) Versus General Anesthesia for Upper Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1562 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. S. Park, E. J. Hur, K. W. Han, H. Y. Kil, and T. H. Han
Bispectral index does not correlate with observer assessment of alertness and sedation scores during 0.5% bupivacaine epidural anesthesia with nitrous oxide sedation.
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 385 - 9, table of contents.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.