Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Spahn, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Spahn, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 5 631-637
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Patient well-being after general anaesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled multi-centre trial comparing intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia

C. K. Hofer1, A. Zollinger1, S. Büchi2, R. Klaghofer2, D. Serafino3, S. Bühlmann1, C. Buddeberg2, T. Pasch3 and D. R. Spahn*,3

1 Institute of Anaesthesiology, Triemli City Hospital, Birmensdorferstr. 497, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland. 2 Department of Psychosocial Medicine, and 3 Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland

Corresponding author: Service d’Anesthésiologie, CHUV-BH-10.305, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: donat.spahn@chuv.hospvd.ch

Background. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative patient well-being after total i.v. anaesthesia compared with inhalation anaesthesia by means of validated psychometric tests.

Methods. With ethics committee approval, 305 patients undergoing minor elective gynaecologic or orthopaedic interventions were assigned randomly to total i.v. anaesthesia using propofol or inhalation anaesthesia using sevoflurane. The primary outcome measurement was the actual mental state 90 min and 24 h after anaesthesia assessed by a blinded observer using the Adjective Mood Scale (AMS) and the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postoperative pain level were determined by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 90 min and 24 h after anaesthesia (secondary outcome measurements). Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a VAS 24 h after anaesthesia.

Results. The AMS and STAI scores were significantly better 90 min after total i.v. anaesthesia compared with inhalation anaesthesia (P=0.02, P=0.05, respectively), but equal 24 h after both anaesthetic techniques (P=0.90, P=0.78, respectively); patient satisfaction was comparable (P=0.26). Postoperative pain was comparable in both groups 90 min and 24 h after anaesthesia (P=0.11, P=0.12, respectively). The incidence of postoperative nausea was reduced after total i.v. compared with inhalation anaesthesia at 90 min (7 vs 35%, P<0.001), and 24 h (33 vs 52%, P=0.001).

Conclusion. Total i.v. anaesthesia improves early postoperative patient well-being and reduces the incidence of PONV.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 631–7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. S. Cheng, J. Yeh, and P. Flood
Anesthesia Matters: Patients Anesthetized with Propofol Have Less Postoperative Pain than Those Anesthetized with Isoflurane
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Rantanen, A. Yli-Hankala, M. van Gils, H. Ypparila-Wolters, P. Takala, M. Huiku, M. Kymalainen, E. Seitsonen, and I. Korhonen
Novel multiparameter approach for measurement of nociception at skin incision during general anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 367 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. J. Magner, C. McCaul, E. Carton, J. Gardiner, and D. Buggy
Effect of intraoperative intravenous crystalloid infusion on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynaecological laparoscopy: comparison of 30 and 10 ml kg-1
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2004; 93(3): 381 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.