Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plourde, G.
Right arrow Articles by Backman, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plourde, G.
Right arrow Articles by Backman, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 4 583-586
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Short Communications

Antagonism of sevoflurane anaesthesia by physostigmine: effects on the auditory steady-state response and bispectral index{dagger}

G. Plourde*, D. Chartrand, P. Fiset, S. Font and S. B. Backman

Department of Anesthesia, McGill University and McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada

Corresponding author: Room S5.05, MUHC, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada. E-mail: gilles.plourde@staff.mcgill.ca
{dagger}Presented in part at the 75th Congress of the IARS, March 2001, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

Background. Physostigmine, a centrally acting anticholinesterase, antagonizes the hypnotic effect of propofol, as shown by the return of consciousness (response to commands) or wakefulness (spontaneous eye-opening without response to commands) and by recovery of auditory evoked potentials (40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR)) and the bispectral index (BIS). We measured the effects of physostigmine on the hypnotic effect of inhaled volatile anaesthetics, using sevoflurane as the representative agent.

Methods. Eight healthy volunteers received sevoflurane adjusted to produce loss of consciousness. Physostigmine (plus glycopyrrolate) was given while the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was kept constant.

Results. Loss of consciousness was accompanied by a significant (P<0.02) decrease in ASSR amplitude (to 21% of awake value) and BIS (to 70% of awake value). Five subjects had return of consciousness or wakefulness after physostigmine. The others showed no behavioural change. Physostigmine caused a significant increase of the mean ASSR amplitude from 0.11 (SD 0.04) to 0.17 (0.06) µV (P<0.05). The BIS also increased, from 66 (12) to 74 (12), but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions. Physostigmine can antagonize, at least partially, the hypnotic effect of sevoflurane and changes in arousal after physostigmine are shown by ASSR measurements. However, the antagonism is not as clear or reliable as with propofol.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 583–6


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. B. Kelz, Y. Sun, J. Chen, Q. Cheng Meng, J. T. Moore, S. C. Veasey, S. Dixon, M. Thornton, H. Funato, and M. Yanagisawa
An essential role for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia
PNAS, January 29, 2008; 105(4): 1309 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
V. Fodale, L. B. Santamaria, S. B. Backman, and G. Plourde
Different actions of sevoflurane and propofol on central nicotinic receptors may explain differences in hypnotic antagonism by cholinesterase inhibitors
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 773 - 775.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.