Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aubrun, F.
Right arrow Articles by Riou, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aubrun, F.
Right arrow Articles by Riou, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 3 314-319
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Adjunctive analgesia with intravenous propacetamol does not reduce morphine-related adverse effects

F. Aubrun*,1, F. Kalfon1, P. Mottet1, A. Bellanger2, O. Langeron1, P. Coriat1 and B. Riou3

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, 2 Department of Pharmacy and 3 Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France

Corresponding author: Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, F-75651 Paris Cedex 13, France. E-mail: frederic.aubrun@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr

Background. Propacetamol is widely used in the management of postoperative pain. It decreases morphine requirements but its effect on the incidence of morphine-related adverse effects remains unknown.

Methods. Patients (550) were randomly assigned to receive propacetamol or a placebo over the first 24 h after operation in a blinded study. Intravenous morphine titration was performed, after which morphine was administered s.c. every 4 h according to their pain score. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The primary end-point was the incidence of morphine-related adverse effects. The main secondary end-points were morphine requirements and VAS score.

Results. After morphine titration, the VAS score and the number of patients with pain relief did not differ between groups. Morphine requirements were decreased in the propacetamol group (21 vs 14.5 mg, P<0.001) but the incidence of morphine-related adverse effects did not differ between groups (42 vs 46%, not significant). In patients with moderate pain (n=395), morphine requirements decreased by 37% (P<0.001) and the percentage of patients requiring no morphine was greater (21 vs 8%, P=0.002) in the propacetamol group. In patients with severe pain (n=155), morphine requirements decreased by 18% (P=0.04) in the propacetamol group and the number of patients who did not require morphine (3 vs 8%) did not differ significantly.

Conclusions. Although propacetamol induced a small morphine-sparing effect, it did not change the incidence of morphine-related adverse effects in the postoperative period. Moreover, no benefit could be demonstrated in patients with severe postoperative pain.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 314–19


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. Aubrun, J. Amour, D. Rosenthal, P. Coriat, and B. Riou
Effects of a loading dose of morphine before i.v. morphine titration for postoperative pain relief: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control study
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. Power
Recent advances in postoperative pain therapy
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 43 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Remy, E. Marret, and F. Bonnet
Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effects and consumption after major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Kapfer, P. Alfonsi, B. Guignard, D. I. Sessler, and M. Chauvin
Nefopam and Ketamine Comparably Enhance Postoperative Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Lahtinen, H. Kokki, T. Hakala, and M. Hynynen
S(+)-Ketamine as an Analgesic Adjunct Reduces Opioid Consumption After Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1295 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. L. Apfelbaum, T. J. Gan, S. Zhao, D. B. Hanna, and C. Chen
Reliability and Validity of the Perioperative Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 699 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.