Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milne, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, G. N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milne, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, G. N. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 2 127-131
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points

S. E. Milne*,1, A. Troy1, M. G. Irwin2 and G. N. C. Kenny1

1 University of Glasgow, Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 10 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK. 2 University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China

Corresponding author: University of Michigan, Department of Anesthesiology, 1H247UH, PO Box 0048, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-9091, USA. E-mail: smilne@umich.edu
{dagger}Declaration of interest. Aspect Medical provided hardware and disposables to conduct this study. The hardware and software system used to calculate the AEPex was licensed by Glasgow University to AstraZeneca. Professor Kenny has acted as a consultant to AstraZeneca.

Background. Many anaesthetists are deterred from using total i.v. anaesthesia because of uncertainty over the concentration of propofol required to prevent awareness. We predicted blood and effect-site concentrations of propofol at two clinical end-points: loss of consciousness and no response to a painful stimulus.

Methods. Forty unpremedicated Caucasian patients were anaesthetized with i.v. propofol delivered by a Diprifusor target-controlled infusion (TCI). Bispectral index (BIS) and auditory evoked potential index (AEPex) were measured and blood and effect-site propofol concentrations were predicted. Logistic regression was used to estimate population values for predicted blood and effect-site propofol concentrations at the clinical end-points and to correlate these with BIS and AEPex.

Results. The effect-site EC50 at loss of consciousness was 2.8 µm ml–1 with an EC05 and an EC95 of 1.5 and 4.1 µm ml–1, respectively. The predicted EC50 when there was no response to a tetanic stimulus was 5.2 µm ml–1 with an EC05 and an EC95 of 3.1 and 7.2 µm ml–1, respectively.

Conclusions. Unconsciousness and lack of response to a painful stimulus occur within a defined range of effect-site concentrations, predicted by Diprifusor TCI software.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 127–31


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. G. Doufas, N. Morioka, A. N. Mahgoub, A. R. Bjorksten, S. L. Shafer, and D. I. Sessler
Automated Responsiveness Monitor to Titrate Propofol Sedation
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2009; 109(3): 778 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Z. Xu, F. Liu, Y. Yue, T. Ye, B. Zhang, M. Zuo, M. Xu, R. Hao, Y. Xu, N. Yang, et al.
C50 for Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion and Bispectral Index at Loss of Consciousness and Response to Painful Stimulus in Chinese Patients: A Multicenter Clinical Trial
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 478 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. I. Cortinez, A. E. Delfino, R. Fuentes, and H. R. Munoz
Performance of the Cerebral State Index During Increasing Levels of Propofol Anesthesia: A Comparison with the Bispectral Index
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 605 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. F. Russell
The Narcotrend 'depth of anaesthesia' monitor cannot reliably detect consciousness during general anaesthesia: an investigation using the isolated forearm technique
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 346 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. A. Lim, K. Y. Lim, W. H. Wong, and M. Iannuzzi
Relationship between bispectral index and effect-site EC50 for propofol
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2006; 96(2): 267 - 268.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Zhong, Q. L. Guo, Y. D. Pang, L. F. Peng, and C. L. Li
Comparative evaluation of the cerebral state index and the bispectral index during target-controlled infusion of propofol
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2005; 95(6): 798 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Iannuzzi, E. Iannuzzi, F. Rossi, L. Berrino, and M. Chiefari
Relationship between Bispectral Index, electroencephalographic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 492 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Iwakiri, N. Nishihara, O. Nagata, T. Matsukawa, M. Ozaki, and D. I. Sessler
Individual Effect-Site Concentrations of Propofol Are Similar at Loss of Consciousness and at Awakening
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 107 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Dullenkopf, A. Schmitz, G. Lamesic, M. Weiss, and A. Lang
The Influence of Acupressure on the Monitoring of Acoustic Evoked Potentials in Unsedated Adult Volunteers
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1147 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.