Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dawidowicz, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Trojanowski, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dawidowicz, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Trojanowski, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 90, No. 1 84-86
© 2003 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Short Communications

Cerebrospinal fluid and blood propofol concentration during total intravenous anaesthesia for neurosurgery

A. L. Dawidowicz*,1, A. Fijalkowska2, A. Nestorowicz2, R. Kalitynski1 and T. Trojanowski3

1 Department of Chemical Physics and Physicochemical Separation Methods, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, 20–031 Lublin, pl. Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej 3, Poland. 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy and 3 Department of Neurosurgery and Paediatric Neurosurgery, University School of Medicine, 20–090 Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, Poland E-mail: dawid@hermes.umcs.lublin.pl

Background. The aim of this paper is to compare the propofol concentration in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients scheduled for different neurosurgical procedures and anaesthetized using propofol as part of a total intravenous anaesthesia technique.

Methods. Thirty-nine patients (ASA I–III) scheduled for elective intracranial procedures, were studied. Propofol was infused initially at 12 mg kg–1 h–1 and then reduced in steps to 9 and 6 mg kg–1 h–1. During anaesthesia, bolus doses of fentanyl and cis-atracurium were administered as necessary. After tracheal intubation the lungs were ventilated to achieve normocapnia with an oxygen-air mixture (FIO2=0.33). Arterial blood and CSF samples for propofol examination were obtained simultaneously directly after intracranial drainage insertion and measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the type of neurosurgery. The Aneurysm group consisted of 13 patients who were surgically treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysm. The Tumour group was composed of 26 patients who were undergoing elective posterior fossa extra-axial tumour removal.

Results. Blood propofol concentrations in both groups did not differ significantly (P>0.05). The propofol concentration in CSF was 86.62 (SD 37.99) ng ml–1 in the Aneurysm group and 50.81 (26.10) ng ml–1 in the Tumour group (P<0.005).

Conclusions. Intracranial pathology may influence CSF propofol concentration. However, the observed discrepancies may also result from quantitative differences in CSF composition and from restricted diffusion of the drug in the CSF.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 84–6


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.