British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 89, No. 3 459-465
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
research-article |
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis
1 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Stellenbosch and Tygerberg Academic Hospital Private Bag 3 Tygervallei 7505, Western Cape, South Africa
2 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Centre Women's College Campus, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2 Canada
*Corresponding author
Background. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is a relatively new method of maintaining labour analgesia. There have been many studies performed that have compared the efficacy of PCEA with continuous epidural infusion (CEI). The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy and safety of PCEA and CEI.
Methods. All randomized controlled trials that compared PCEA, without background infusion, with CEI were sought from the literature. These were rated for quality using a validated, fivepoint scale. The primary outcome was the number of patients who received anaesthetic interventions. Secondary outcomes included the dose of local anaesthetic, incidence of motor block, quality of analgesia, obstetric and safety outcomes. Where feasible, the data were combined using meta-analytical techniques. For dichotomous data, the risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. For continuous data, the weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated. The differences were statistically significant when the 95% CI excluded 0.
Results. Nine studies comprised of 640 patients were found. There were fewer anaesthetic interventions in the PCEA group (RD, 27%; 95% CI, 18–36%; P<0.00001). This group also received less local anaesthetic (WMD, –3.92; 95% CI, –5.38 to –2.42; P<00001) and less motor block (RD, 18%; 95% CI, 6–31 %; P = 0.003). Both methods were safe for mother and newborn.
Conclusion. Patients who receive PCEA are less likely to require anaesthetic interventions, require lower doses of local anaesthetic and have less motor block than those who receive CEI. Future research should be directed at determining differences in maternal satisfaction and obstetric outcome.
analgesia, obstetric analgesia, patient-controlled analgesic techniques, epidural safety, techniques
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. P. Turkstra and P. M. Jones Is There Evidence for Improved Maternal Satisfaction with Patient-Controlled Epidural Anesthesia? Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1344 - 1344. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Lim, M. Supandji, W. Teoh, C. Ocampo, and A. T. Sia In Response: Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1345 - 1346. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. H. Halpern and B. Carvalho Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Lim, C. E. Ocampo, M. Supandji, W. H. L. Teoh, and A. T. Sia A Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Regimens for Labor Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1968 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Pildal, A Hrobjartsson, K. Jorgensen, J Hilden, D. Altman, and P. Gotzsche Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 36(4): 847 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Brodner, H. Buerkle, H. Van Aken, R. Lambert, M.-L. Schweppe-Hartenauer, C. Wempe, and W. Gogarten Postoperative Analgesia After Knee Surgery: A Comparison of Three Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Continuous Femoral Nerve Blockade Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Nightingale, M. V. Knight, B. Higgins, and T. Dean Randomized, double-blind comparison of patient-controlled epidural infusion vs nurse-administered epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing colonic resection Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 380 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. T. Sia, Y. Lim, and C. Ocampo A Comparison of a Basal Infusion with Automated Mandatory Boluses in Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. D. W. Fettes, C. S. Moore, J. B. Whiteside, G. A. Mcleod, and J. A. W. Wildsmith Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 359 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|