Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkes, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkes, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 89, No. 3 452-458
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and diamorphine in addition to bupivacaine for Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

C. M. Cowan1,*, J. B. Kendall2, P. M. Barclay3 and R. G. Wilkes3

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Wirral Hospitals Arrowe Park Road, Upton, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK
2 Department of Anaesthesia, The Cardiothoracic Centre Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK
3 Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK

*Corresponding author

Background. Co-administration of small doses of opioids and bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia reduces intraoperative discomfort and may reduce postoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing Caesarean section. Fentanyl and diamorphine are the two most frequently used agents in UK obstetric anaesthetic practice.

Methods. Seventy-five healthy parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, were randomly allocated to additionally receive intrathecal fentanyl 20 µg, diamorphine 300 µg or 0.9% saline. Patients also received i.v. cyclizine and rectal diclofenac.

Results. Less supplementary intraoperative analgesia was required by patients in either opioid group (4%) compared with the control (32%) (P<0.05). Twenty four hours after spinal injection, total mean (SD) postoperative morphine requirement was significantly lower if diamorphine was administered (31 (21) mg), in comparison with the other two groups (control 68 (26) mg; fentanyl 62 (26) mg) (P<0.05). Reduced visual analogue pain scores were evident 12 h following diamorphine, but observed only for 1 h after fentanyl when compared with the control (P<0.05). Mild pruritis was more common for 2 h after either spinal opioid (P<0.05), but no inter-group differences were observed for the remainder of the first 24 h. Patients displayed deeper levels of sedation both acutely and 12 h after administration of intrathecal fentanyl (P<0.05).

Conclusions. Both intrathecal opioids reduce intraoperative discomfort, but only diamorphine reduced postoperative analgesic requirement beyond the immediate postoperative period.

analgesia, postoperative analgesics opioid, fentanyl analgesics opioid, diamorphine surgery, obstetric


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S Saravanan, A. P. C. Robinson, A. Q. Dar, M. O. Columb, and G. R. Lyons
Minimum dose of intrathecal diamorphine required to prevent intraoperative supplementation of spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 368 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. W. Cooper, C. M. Cowan, K. Smith, J. B. Kendall, and R. G. Wilkes
Intrathecal diamorphine or intrathecal fentanyl to supplement spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section?
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2003; 90(1): 107 - 107.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.