Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 89, No. 3 382-388
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Effect of propofol anaesthesia on the event-related potential mismatch negativity and the auditory-evoked potential N1

T. P. Simpson1, A. R. Manara*,1, N. M. Kane2, R. L. Barton3, C. A. Rowlands3 and S. R. Butler3

1 Department of Anaesthesia and 2 Department of Neurophysiology Frenchay Hospital, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK. 3 The Burden Neurological Institute, Stoke Lane, Bristol BS16 1QT, UK*Corresponding author

Background. Studies on the effects of anaesthesia on event-related potentials and long latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) are sparse. Both provide information on cortical processing and may have potential as monitors of awareness. We studied the effect of propofol on the event-related potential mismatch negativity (MMN) and the long-latency AEP N1.

Methods. Twenty-one patients received 1 µg ml–1 stepped increases in the target concentration of propofol using DiprifusorTM until a maximum of 6 µg ml–1 was achieved or the patient had lost consciousness. Neurophysiological responses (MMN and N1) and the patients’ level of consciousness were recorded before the administration of propofol and at a target effector site concentration of propofol of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 µg ml–1. Grand average evoked potentials were computed at baseline, before the administration of propofol (A); at the highest propofol concentration at which each patient was responsive (B); and at the concentration of propofol at which the patient became unconscious (C).

Results. Patients lost consciousness at different target concentrations of propofol, all being unresponsive by 4 µg ml–1. The response to the deviant stimuli used to elicit duration-shift MMN was significantly more negative than to the standard stimuli at A (mean difference 2.58 µV, P=0.0011) but this difference was virtually abolished at point B, before the patients lost consciousness (mean difference 0.63 µV, P=ns). The amplitude of N1 evoked by standard stimuli was negative compared with electrical baseline at both point A (mean amplitude –3.81 µV, P<0.001) and at point B (mean amplitude –2.2 µV, P=0.002), but was no longer significantly different to baseline at point C (mean amplitude 0.51 µV, P=ns). The change in the mean amplitude of N1 from last awake (point B) to first unconscious (point C) was also significant (mean difference in amplitude 1.69 µV, P=0.02).

Conclusions. MMN is unlikely to be a clinically useful tool to detect awareness in surgical patients. In contrast, the loss of N1 may identify the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness and deserves further study.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 382–8


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. M. Westeren-Punnonen, H. Ypparila, T. Musialowicz, I. Korhonen, M. Hynynen, and J. Partanen
Recovery of N100 component of auditory event-related potentials and EEG after cardiac arrest during propofol sedation
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2005; 94(5): 626 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Haenggi, H. Ypparila, J. Takala, I. Korhonen, M. Luginbuhl, S. Petersen-Felix, and S. M. Jakob
Measuring Depth of Sedation with Auditory Evoked Potentials During Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Remifentanil in Healthy Volunteers
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1728 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
W. Heinke, C. J. Fiebach, C. Schwarzbauer, M. Meyer, D. Olthoff, and K. Alter
Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 641 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.