Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janssens, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janssens, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 89, No. 2 237-241
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Comparison of oesophageal and gastric air tonometry in patients with circulatory failure

U. Janssens*, H. Groesdonk, J. Graf, P. W. Radke, W. Lepper and P. Hanrath

FESC, Medical Clinic I, University of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52057 Aachen, Germany*Corresponding author

Background. Gastric PCO2 measured by balloon tonometry can estimate the adequacy of splanchnic perfusion. However, enteral feeding and gastric content can interfere with gastric PCO2 assessment. Tonometry in other sites of the body could avoid these problems. We therefore tested the hypothesis that oesophageal air tonometry would give results similar to gastric tonometry.

Methods. We studied 20 consecutive patients (mean age 68 (SD 9) [range 49–81] yr, 18 males, SAPS II score 55 (SD 18), ICU mortality 55%) with circulatory disorders during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Tonometer probes were placed via the nose, one into the stomach and the other in the oesophagus. PCO2 was measured with two automated gas analysers, at admission and 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 32, 40, and 48 h thereafter.

Results. One hundred and forty-eight paired measurements were obtained. Gastric PCO2 was greater than oesophageal PCO2 on admission (7.19 (1.43) vs 5.89 (0.73) kPa, P<0.01) and subsequently. Differences between the measures correlated (r=0.67) with the mean absolute value, indicating that overestimation increased as gastric PCO2 increased.

Conclusions. Oesophageal PCO2 is less than gastric PCO2, and the difference is greater when gastric PCO2 levels are greater. Air tonometry may not measure regional PCO2 levels in the oesophagus satisfactorily. Other methods and sites for carbon dioxide tonometry should be examined.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 237–41


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.