Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claxton, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Claxton, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 6 870-873
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Case Reports

No response to trigger agents in a malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patient

B. A. Claxton*,1, M. H. Cross2 and P. M. Hopkins3

1Department of Anaesthesia, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, 2Department of Anaesthesia, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds and 3Malignant Hyperthermia Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK*Corresponding author

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility is an inherited disorder, where a life-threatening condition can result from exposure to a trigger agent or agents. Succinylcholine and volatile anaesthetic agents are well established to be trigger agents in anaesthetic practice. We describe a case of a previously investigated malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patient who did not declare his status and was exposed to both succinylcholine and isoflurane, without any detectable reaction. Possible explanations for the lack of reaction include a subnormal temperature when exposed to isoflurane, and a significant interval between exposure to succinylcholine and isoflurane. Absence of a reaction to trigger agents on this occasion is not thought to indicate an incorrect diagnosis and labelling.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 870–3


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.