Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dockery, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dockery, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 5 649-652
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Respiratory response to skin incision during anaesthesia with infusions of propofol and alfentanil

M. P. Dockery and G. B. Drummond*

University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK*Corresponding author

Background. The ventilatory response to skin incision during anaesthesia with enflurane is an increase in tidal volume without a change in frequency. As opioids affect respiratory frequency and also affect the processing of pain, we investigated if the breathing response to a painful stimulus could be different during anaesthesia using opioids.

Methods. We studied 12 patients during anaesthesia with target-controlled infusions of propofol (plasma target concentration 4–6 µg ml–1) and alfentanil (plasma target concentration 40–60 ng ml–1), having varicose vein surgery.

Results. After the initial skin incision, tidal volume increased promptly by 17 (4, 81)% (median, quartile values) (P<0.01). Respiratory frequency changed variably with no significant change overall [median change 2 (–8, +50)%]. The duration of inspiration was virtually unaltered, and the duration of expiration decreased gradually by 5 (–7, 32)%. Patients who showed more response also showed more change in tidal volume, so that there was a significant relationship between increased inspiratory flow rate and reduced expiratory time (P<0.05).

Conclusions. During opioid anaesthesia, the mechanism of ventilatory increase after stimulation involves changes in both drive and timing of breathing. This pattern of response does not resemble the changes seen during anaesthesia with potent volatile agents.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 649–52


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.