Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziser, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rozenberg, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziser, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rozenberg, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 4 577-579
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Short Communications

The postanaesthesia care unit as a temporary admission location due to intensive care and ward overflow{dagger}{ddagger}

A. Ziser*,1, M. Alkobi1, R. Markovits1 and B. Rozenberg1

1Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Medical Center, PO Box 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel*Corresponding author

{dagger}This article is accompanied by Editorial III.
{ddagger}This manuscript was presented in part, at the 12th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists, June 4–9, 2000, Montreal, Canada.

Background. With the increasing number of critically ill patients, and shortage of intensive care unit and ward beds, some postoperative patients stay for an unnecessarily long period in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), until a suitable bed is available.

Methods. We prospectively studied this patient overflow admission to the PACU over 33 months. Four hundred patients with a mean age of 53.1 yr (range 0.2–94) were studied. Two hundred and eighty one (70.3%) patients were mechanically ventilated on admission to the PACU and 311 (77.8%) had invasive monitoring. Mean length of stay in the PACU was 12.9 (SD 10.6) h.

Results. The busiest hours of admission were 01–11 am. Eighteen (4.5%) patients died in the PACU, while waiting for an intensive care unit bed. The main problems were insufficient medical and nursing coverage, and inadequate communication and visiting facilities for patient’s families.

Conclusion. Patient overflow to the PACU is a common problem that requires attention. Guidelines for medical and nursing coverage, patient triage, and communication with relatives need to be outlined.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 577–9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Aps
Editorial III: Surgical critical care: the Overnight Intensive Recovery (OIR) concept
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2004; 92(2): 164 - 166.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
A. G. Jones and S. J. Harper
Editorial III: 'Ventilating in recovery'--the way forward: intensive therapy or postoperative critical care?
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2002; 88(4): 473 - 474.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.