Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leong, Y. P.
Right arrow Articles by Torrance, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leong, Y. P.
Right arrow Articles by Torrance, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 1 61-64
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Extreme value theory applied to postoperative breathing patterns

Y. P. Leong, J. W. Sleigh* and J. M. Torrance

Department of Anaesthesia, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand*Corresponding author

Background. There has been little published work on the statistical features of breath times in postoperative patients. We applied extreme value theory (a statistical method) to the variation in the timing of postoperative breathing.

Methods. We observed 49 patients 3–6 h after a variety of surgical procedures, once they had achieved a stable breathing pattern. The breathing patterns could be one of the three types predicted by the extreme value model. ‘Finite’ breathing patterns (n=30) have a finite upper limit of duration for any apnoea. Patients that displayed one of the other two patterns (‘standard’ and ‘extended’) have, potentially, no limit in duration of apnoea.

Results. The type of breathing pattern observed in each patient was not reliably identified by most of the commonly used risk factors (age, type of surgery, opioid type, dose, and route of administration). A finite pattern was observed in 13 of 26 patients receiving epidural (vs 17 of 23 parenteral analgesia: P=0.15), and 15 of 19 receiving morphine (vs 15 of 30 other opioids: P=0.05). The patients with ‘finite’ patterns were also significantly less drowsy (score 1.04 (0.92) vs 1.62 (0.62), P<0.05).

Conclusions. The breathing pattern was not related to mean breath times, suggesting that the prevalence of apnoeas cannot be reliably predicted by measurement of the respiratory rate alone.

Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 61–4


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.