Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veering, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by van Kleef, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veering, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by van Kleef, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 5 738-742
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effects of duration spent in the sitting position

B. T. Veering*,1, T. T. M. Immink-Speet1,2, A. G. L. Burm1, R. Stienstra1 and J. W. van Kleef1

1Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands 2Present address: Department of Anaesthesiology, Stichting Streekziekenhuis Coevorden-Hardenberg, M. van Thijnensingel 1, 7741 GB Coevorden, The Netherlands*Corresponding author

Sixty patients, aged 65–84 yr, undergoing minor urological surgery under spinal anaesthesia remained sitting for 2 (group 1, n=15), 5 (group 2, n=15), 10 (group 3, n=15), or 20 (group 4, n=15) min after completion of the subarachnoid administration of 3 ml of a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution. They were then placed in the supine position. Analgesia levels were assessed bilaterally using pinprick. Motor block was scored using a 12-point scale. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate were also recorded. Twenty minutes after the injection the upper analgesia levels were lower (P<0.05) in group 4 (median T9.0) than in the groups 1–3 (medians T6.6–T8.5). The highest obtained levels (medians T5.7–T8.0) did not differ between the groups, but occurred later (P<0.05) in group 4 (median 35 min) than in groups 1–3 (medians 19–24 min). There were no significant differences in the maximum degree of motor block or haemodynamic changes between the four study groups.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 738–42


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Hocking and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Intrathecal drug spread
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 568 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.