Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (68)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 2 186-192
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey

H. M. Soliman, C. Mélot and J.-L. Vincent

1Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Route de Lennik 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium*Corresponding author

{dagger}This article is accompanied by Editorial II.

Sedation and analgesia are important aspects of patient care on the intensive care unit (ICU), yet relatively little information is available on common sedative and analgesic practice. We sought to assess international differences in the prescription of sedative and analgesic drugs in western European ICUs by means of a short, self-administered questionnaire. Six hundred and forty-seven intensive care physicians from 16 western European countries replied to the questionnaire. Midazolam was used as a sedative often or always by 63% of respondents and propofol by 35%. There were considerable international variations, with midazolam being preferred over propofol in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Austria. For analgesia, the drugs most commonly used were morphine (33%), fentanyl (33%) and sufentanil (24%). Morphine was preferred over fentanyl and sufentanil in Norway, UK and Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Spain and Portugal. Fentanyl was preferred in France, Germany and Italy. Sufentanil was preferred in Belgium and Luxemburg and in Austria. Multivariate analysis showed that the combination of midazolam with fentanyl was most often used in France; propofol with morphine in Sweden, the UK and Ireland, and Switzerland; midazolam with morphine in Norway; and propofol with sufentanil in Belgium and Luxemburg, Germany and Italy. The use of a sedation scale varied from 72% in the UK and Ireland to 18% in Austria. When used, the most common sedation scale was the Ramsay scale. This study demonstrates substantial international differences in sedative and analgesic practices in western European ICUs.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 186–92


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
C. N. Sessler and K. Varney
Patient-Focused Sedation and Analgesia in the ICU*
Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 552 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Kadoi, S. Saito, C. Kawauchi, H. Hinohara, and F. Kunimoto
Comparative effects of propofol vs dexmedetomidine on cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in patients with septic shock
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Park, M. Lane, S. Rogers, and P. Bassett
A comparison of hypnotic and analgesic based sedation in a general intensive care unit
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-P. Roustan, S. Valette, P. Aubas, G. Rondouin, and X. Capdevila
Can Electroencephalographic Analysis Be Used to Determine Sedation Levels in Critically Ill Patients?
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1141 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
A. Arroliga, F. Frutos-Vivar, J. Hall, A. Esteban, C. Apezteguia, L. Soto, A. Anzueto, and for the International Mechanical Ventilation Study
Use of Sedatives and Neuromuscular Blockers in a Cohort of Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 496 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. G. Fritz, M. Holzmayr, B. Walter, K.-U. Moeritz, A. Lupp, and R. Bauer
The Effect of Mild Hypothermia on Plasma Fentanyl Concentration and Biotransformation in Juvenile Pigs
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 996 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
K.-L. Kong and J. F. Bion
Editorial I: Sedating patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit--winds of change?
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 267 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
G.R. Park
Editorial II: Sedation and analgesia--which way is best?
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2001; 87(2): 183 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.