Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidlin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidlin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, E. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 6 769-776
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Monitoring level of sedation with bispectral EEG analysis: comparison between hypothermic and normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass{dagger}

D. Schmidlin1, P. Hager2 and E. R. Schmid1

1Division of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia, 2Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland*Corresponding author

{dagger}Part of this work was presented as a poster at the meeting of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists (EACTA) in Bergen, Norway (June 18, 1998), and its abstract was published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia.

The level of sedation of 28 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting with fentanyl–propofol anaesthesia was monitored with bispectral analysis (BIS), spectral edge frequency, and band power of the electroencephalogram. Fourteen patients underwent hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (32°C, group H), and 14 normothermic CPB (group N). The level of sedation was measured with Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Score and with Ramsay Sedation Score. BIS was the only EEG measurement that paralleled the clinical course of the patients’ sedation level. Values (median, 95% confidence intervals (CI)) changed significantly over time in both groups (P<0.0001). In group H, BIS decreased from 97 (95, 99) the day before surgery to 48 (44, 52) after tracheal intubation, to 46 (41, 52) before going off CPB, to 91 (85, 97) immediately before extubation. In group N, values were 93 (91, 97) the day before surgery, 53 (47, 59) after tracheal intubation, 48 (43, 53) before going off CPB, and 90 (84, 96) before extubation. During CPB, BIS values were significantly different between the two groups. Group H had a median of 41 (95% CI, 39, 42), and group N had a median of 49 (95% CI, 48, 51, P<0.0001). Peak values of all other processed EEG parameters during anaesthesia and surgery overlapped with values from the day before, when patients had no sedating medication, and these values did not correlate to the patients’ course of sedation during the study. There was no explicit recall of the surgery in either group. During the phases of anaesthesia and surgery without CPB, the progression of BIS levels was comparable with previously published data for non-cardiac surgery. During normothermic CPB, the highest BIS values were close to values representing insufficient depth of sedation. It remains to be elucidated whether the much lower BIS values in the hypothermic group were solely a result of brain cooling or if increased serum propofol concentrations, because of slowed pharmacodynamics during hypothermia, also contributed.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 769–76


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PerfusionHome page
P. Mathew, G. Puri, and R. Dhaliwal
Propofol requirement titrated to bispectral index: a comparison between hypothermic and normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 27 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. S. Leggat and G. W. Fischer
Early Detection of an Acute Cerebral Event During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using a Bispectral Index Monitor
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 80 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
E. Takizawa, H. Hiraoka, D. Takizawa, and F. Goto
Changes in the effect of propofol in response to altered plasma protein binding during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2006; 96(2): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. A. Dahaba
Different Conditions That Could Result in the Bispectral Index Indicating an Incorrect Hypnotic State
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 765 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Ahonen, A. Sahlman, A. Yli-Hankala, H. Eriksson, A. Nemlander, J. Ramo, and M. Salmenpera
No effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on hypnosis in patients anaesthetized with propofol and alfentanil
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2004; 92(1): 137 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
R. R. D. Marks
Editorial II: Which anaesthetic agent for maintenance during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass?
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 118 - 121.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Yoshitani, M. Kawaguchi, M. Takahashi, K. Kitaguchi, and H. Furuya
Plasma propofol concentration and EEG burst suppression ratio during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 122 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.