Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strickland, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond*, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strickland, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond*, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 5 639-644
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Comparison of pattern of breathing with other measures of induction of anaesthesia, using propofol, methohexital, and sevoflurane{dagger}

T. L. Strickland and G. B. Drummond*

Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK*Corresponding author

{dagger}Presented to the Anaesthetic Research Society, Aberdeen, 25th March 1999 (Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: P180–1).

We assessed change of the pattern of breathing as a marker of induction of anaesthesia, using a method of maintaining spontaneous breathing throughout the induction period. We compared this index with a measure used clinically, the lash reflex, and measures used for drug investigations such as loss of grip of an object, cessation of finger tapping, and loss of arm tone. Ninety female patients (mean age 32 (17–63) yr, mean weight 63 (10) kg) were randomly allocated to induction of anaesthesia using propofol, methohexital, or sevoflurane. The i.v. agents were given by slow injection estimated to give an induction dose (for weight drop end point) in 90 s. Sevoflurane was given by progressively increasing the inhaled concentration to 8% so that induction should occur within 90–120 s. We measured time to change in breathing pattern, loss of voluntary finger tapping, loss of the lash reflex (tested at 15 s intervals), loss of postural tone in an outstretched arm, and loss of grip of a small metal cylinder held between finger and thumb. For methohexital and sevoflurane, the mean times for induction of anaesthesia occurred in the above order. With propofol, the lash reflex and tone were lost at the same time. The mean (SD) time to induction, by loss of arm tone was 64 (16) s for propofol, 83 (23) s for methohexital, and 94 (31) s for sevoflurane. The mean time to change in breathing pattern was 47 (20) s for propofol, 53 (14) s for methohexital, and 78 (29) s for sevoflurane. Although the time to achieve each end point was different, all the end points (except the lash reflex) appeared to provide similar measures of induction of anaesthesia. The pattern of breathing is an early sign of the onset of anaesthesia.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 639–44


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
L. M. Ferguson and G. B. Drummond
Acute effects of fentanyl on breathing pattern in anaesthetized subjects
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 384 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. L. Knaggs and G. B. Drummond
Randomized comparison of three methods of induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2005; 95(2): 178 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.