Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viitanen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Annila, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viitanen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Annila, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 4 572-575
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Analgesic efficacy of tramadol 2 mg kg–1 for paediatric day-case adenoidectomy

H. Viitanen1 * and P. Annila2

1Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Central Hospital of Seinäjoki, Hanneksenrinne 7, 60220 Seinäjoki, Finland. 2Tampere University Hospital and Medical School, Tampere, Finland*Corresponding author

We studied the analgesic efficacy of tramadol 2 mg kg–1 for post-operative analgesia after day-case adenoidectomy in children aged 1–3 yr. Eighty children were allocated randomly to receive tramadol 2 mg kg–1 i.v. or placebo immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 10 µg kg–1 and propofol 4 mg kg–1 followed by mivacurium 0.2 mg kg–1 for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was continued with sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen. All children were given ibuprofen rectally at approximately 10 mg kg–1 before the start of surgery. Post-operative pain and recovery assessments were performed by a nurse blinded to the analgesic treatment using the Aldrete recovery score, the pain/discomfort scale and measurement of recovery times. Rescue medication (pethidine in increments of 5 mg i.v.) was administered according to the pain scores. A post-operative questionnaire was used to evaluate the need for analgesia at home up to 24 h after operation. Rescue analgesic at home was rectal or oral ibuprofen 125 mg. Children in the tramadol group required fewer pethidine doses than those in the placebo group (P=0.014). Forty-five per cent of children receiving tramadol did not require post-operative analgesia at all compared with 15% of children receiving placebo (P=0.003). Recovery times and the incidence of adverse effects were similar in the two groups in the recovery room and at home. The requirement for rectal ibuprofen at home did not differ between groups.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 572–5


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. Viitanen, N. Tuominen, H. Vaaraniemi, E. Nikanne, and P. Annila
Analgesic efficacy of rectal acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone or in combination for paediatric day-case adenoidectomy{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 363 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
P. C. Walker and D. S. Wagner
Treatment of Pain in Pediatric Patients
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2003; 16(4): 261 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P J Mathew and J L Mathew
Assessment and management of pain in infants
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2003; 79(934): 438 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. B. Rose, J. C. Finkel, A. Arquedas-Mohs, B. P. Himelstein, M. Schreiner, and R. A. Medve
Oral Tramadol for the Treatment of Pain of 7-30 Days' Duration in Children
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 78 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.