Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodchild, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nadeson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodchild, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nadeson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 4 528-534
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Antinociceptive properties of neurosteroids IV: pilot study demonstrating the analgesic effects of alphadolone administered orally to humans

C. S. Goodchild, A. Robinson and R. Nadeson

Department of Anaesthesia, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia*Corresponding author

Fourteen patients scheduled for orthopaedic knee reconstruction surgery were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind, randomized study in which they received alphadolone (25–500 mg, n=9) or placebo (lactose, n=5) given orally 1 h after operation. All the subjects received a standardized general anaesthetic and the same type of surgery followed by physiotherapy using a continuous passive movement machine. Morphine was administered intravenously after operation by patient-controlled analgesia. Verbal rating and visual analogue scores assessed pain experiences for 6 h. Orally administered alphadolone up to 500 mg caused no increase in sedation, respiratory depression, nausea or vomiting. The experiences of these side-effects were all rated as none, mild or moderate. Orally administered alphadolone caused statistically significant reductions in morphine use and simultaneous highly significant reductions in pain scores. We conclude that alphadolone is a useful analgesic in humans when given by the oral route.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 528–34


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
C. Kibaly, L. Meyer, C. Patte-Mensah, and A. G. Mensah-Nyagan
Biochemical and functional evidence for the control of pain mechanisms by dehydroepiandrosterone endogenously synthesized in the spinal cord
FASEB J, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 93 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Patte-Mensah, C. Kibaly, and A. G. Mensah-Nyagan
Substance P inhibits progesterone conversion to neuroactive metabolites in spinal sensory circuit: A potential component of nociception
PNAS, June 21, 2005; 102(25): 9044 - 9049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.