Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wahlström, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wahlström, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 3 403-412
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Research

Evaluation and comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of allopregnanolone and pregnanolone at induction of anaesthesia in the male rat

D. Zhu1, M. D. Wang1, T. Bäckström1 and G. Wahlström2

1Department of Clinical Science, Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. 2Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden*Corresponding author

Abstract

We have evaluated and compared the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of allopregnanolone and pregnanolone at induction of anaesthesia in male rats. A threshold method was used, and the first burst suppression period of 1 s or more in the EEG was selected as the end-point after fairly slow infusions. An optimal dose of 4.0 mg kg–1 min–1 was noted for both steroids. Brain concentrations were low at low infusion rates, indicating that acute tolerance was not occurring. Significant positive correlations were noted between dose rate and serum concentrations of allopregnanolone (r = 0.94, P<0.001) and pregnanolone (r = 0.88, P<0.001). Such correlations were also seen in striatum, cerebellum, cortex and muscle for both steroids (P<0.01). Despite changing infusion rates, the concentrations of both steroids in brainstem, hippocampus and fat remained stable. Because no correlation between infusion rate and steroid concentration was noted in the brainstem and hippocampus, these two brain areas may be regarded as primary sites of action for allopregnanolone and pregnanolone. Pregnanolone concentrations in the brainstem and hippocampus were significantly higher than those of allopregnanolone, suggesting that allopregnanolone was more potent than pregnanolone in inducing anaesthesia.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 403–12


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Zhu, V. Birzniece, T. Backstrom, and G. Wahlstrom
Dynamic aspects of acute tolerance to allopregnanolone evaluated using anaesthesia threshold in male rats
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 560 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.