British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 85, No. 6 844-849
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Weal and flare responses to intradermal rocuronium and cisatracurium in humans
1Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. 2Department of Dermatology, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.*Corresponding author
Thirty volunteers underwent intradermal skin testing with increasing concentrations of rocuronium and cisatracurium to evaluate weal and flare responses, and whether either agent would cause mast cell degranulation and sensitization upon re-exposure. We found that intradermal injection of rocuronium and cisatracurium at concentrations >104 M resulted in positive weal (>8 mm) responses, and positive flare responses at >104 and >105 M respectively. Only cisatracurium caused mild to moderate mast cell degranulation, and neither drug caused significant in vitro histamine release from whole blood collected from study subjects 4 weeks after skin testing. Skin testing with rocuronium and cisatracurium should be performed at concentrations <104 and <105 M respectively to avoid false-positive responses. The ability of these agents to produce positive weal and flare responses at relatively low concentrations may explain the high incidence of potential reactions reported.
Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 8449
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Dewachter and C. Mouton-Faivre Skin Testing Performed in Individuals Cannot be Compared with Responses from Anaphylactic Patients Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1441 - 1441. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Levy Skin Testing Performed in Individuals Cannot be Compared with Responses from Anaphylactic Patients Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1441 - 1441. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Levy and N. F. Adkinson Jr Anaphylaxis During Cardiac Surgery: Implications for Clinicians Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 392 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Mertes, M. C. Laxenaire, J. M. Malinovsky, E. Florvaag, and D. A. Moneret-Vautrin Skin Sensitivity to Rocuronium and Vecuronium: Prick-Tests Are Not Intradermal Test Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1539 - 1539. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dhonneur Skin Sensitivity to Rocuronium and Vecuronium: Prick-Tests Are Not Intradermal Test Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1539 - 1540. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fisher and G. Dhonneur Prick Testing for Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs * Response Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1880 - 1881. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Axon and J. M. Hunter Editorial III: Anaphylaxis and anaesthesia--all clear now? Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 501 - 504. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Levy Anaphylactic Reactions to Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs: Are We Making the Correct Diagnosis? Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 881 - 882. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dhonneur, X. Combes, D. Chassard, and J. C. Merle Skin Sensitivity to Rocuronium and Vecuronium: A Randomized Controlled Prick-Testing Study in Healthy Volunteers Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 986 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Hepner and M. C. Castells Anaphylaxis During the Perioperative Period Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1381 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Baillard, A. M. Korinek, V. Galanton, Y. Le Manach, P. Larmignat, M. Cupa, and C. M. Samama Anaphylaxis to rocuronium Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2002; 88(4): 600 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Moore and J. M. Hunter The new neuromuscular blocking agents: do they offer any advantages? Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2001; 87(6): 912 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Laxenaire, P. M. Mertes, and Groupe d'Etudes des Reactions Anaphylactoides Pera Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Results of a two-year survey in France Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2001; 87(4): 549 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rose and M. Fisher Rocuronium: high risk for anaphylaxis? Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 678 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

