Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cleave-Hogg, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cleave-Hogg, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 85, No. 5 779-781
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Brief Communication

A Canadian simulation experience: faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study

P. J. Morgan1,* and D. Cleave-Hogg2

1University of Toronto, Department of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Women’s College Campus, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1B2 2Medical Education, Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Centre for Research in Education at the Toronto Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Bell Wing 6-600, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4

{dagger}Presented in part at the International Anaesthesia Research Society, 2000.

Abstract

One hundred and forty-three students and 18 faculty at the University of Toronto participated in a study of the anaesthesia simulator as an evaluation tool. Both student and faculty opinions regarding the experience were elicited using questionnaires with a five-point scale, 1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree. Faculty and student opinion were similar and positive with respect to the use of the simulator and matching of educational objectives, its use as a learning experience, its use as an evaluation tool and the need for familiarity with the tool before use as an assessment method. This study supports the use of the simulator as an evaluation tool based on faculty and student opinions provided that prior exposure to the environment is offered.

Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 779-81

Footnotes

* Corresponding author


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
K. A. Khurshid, J. I. Bennett, S. Vicari, K. L. Lee, and K. E. Broquet
Residency Programs and Psychotherapy Competencies: A Survey of Chief Residents
Acad Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 29(5): 452 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
K. K. Cogbill, P. S. O'Sullivan, and J. Clardy
Residents' Perception of Effectiveness of Twelve Evaluation Methods for Measuring Competency
Acad Psychiatry, March 1, 2005; 29(1): 76 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.