Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Samra, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Samra, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 85, No. 2 314-316
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Brief Communication

Prospective evaluation of deep topical fornix nerve block versus peribulbar nerve block in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification

E. S. Aziz1,* and A. Samra2

1Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, 35A Abou Elfeda Street, Zamalek, Cairo, Egypt and 2Department of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Cairo, Egypt*Corresponding author

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of deep topical fornix nerve block anaesthesia (DTFNBA) versus peribulbar nerve block in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification. We studied 120 patients, allocated randomly to two groups. Group 1 (n=60) received peribulbar block with 5 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine supplemented with hyaluronidase 300 i.u. ml–1. Group 2 received DTFNBA with placement of a sponge soaked with 0.5% bupivacaine deep into the conjunctival fornices for 15 min. No sedation was given to either group. Analgesia was assessed by the reaction to insertion of the superior rectus suture and by questioning during the procedure. A three-point scoring system was used (no pain=0, discomfort=1, pain=2). Scoring was repeated at keratotomy, hydrodissection and hydrodelineation, phacoemulsification, irrigation and aspiration, and at intraocular lens insertion. If the patient’s pain score was 0 or 1, no further action was taken. If the pain score at any stage of the operation was 2, intracameral injection of 1% preservative-free lidocaine was given. One patient in Group 2 needed intracameral lidocaine at the stage of phacoemulsification (P>0.05) and four experienced discomfort at irrigation and aspiration (P=0.043). We conclude that DTFNBA may be a useful needle-free anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.

Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 314–6

Footnotes

* Corerspondign author


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
U. Tinnungwattana, S. Gorvanich, K. Kulvichit, and W. Tulvatana
Combined Deep Topical and Superior Subconjunctival Anesthesia for Extracapsular Cataract Extraction in a Rural Eye Camp
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2009; 109(6): 2025 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
E. S. Aziz and M. Rageh
Deep topical fornix nerve block versus peribulbar block in one-step adjustable-suture horizontal strabismus surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2002; 88(1): 129 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.