British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 4 544-552, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
M. J. Hiesmayr, T. Neugebauer, A. Lassnigg, H. Steltzer, W. Haider and H. Gilly
We have evaluated the effect of delivering nitric oxide using a continuous
flow system (CFS) or two commercially available proportional gas injection
systems (PGIS), Nodomo (Drager, Lubeck, Germany) and Pulmonox-Mini (Messer
Griesheim Austria, Gumpoldskirchen, Austria) on measured and simulated
concentrations of nitric oxide. Nitric oxide concentration was measured in
a bench test at five sites in the inspiratory breathing system during
volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation and mathematically simulated
using a mixing chamber model. For a target concentration of 10 parts per
million (ppm) at the "Y" piece, simulated nitric oxide concentrations were
1.9-139 ppm for CFS, 0.3-22 ppm for the Nodomo and 0.0-31 ppm for the
Pulmonox-Mini near the nitric oxide administration site. However, peak
concentrations decreased rapidly along the inspiratory system. Measured and
simulated variations depended on the nitric oxide delivery system, site of
measurement and tidal volume. Measured variations were four times smaller
in the Nodomo than in the Pulmonox-Mini and CFS. As inappropriate mixing
may occur even with PGIS, nitric oxide should probably not be administered
near the "Y" piece.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Performance of proportional and continuous nitric oxide delivery systems during pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation
Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital AKH, University of Vienna, Austria; Department of General Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital AKH, University of Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental Anaesthesiology and Research in Intensive Care, University Hospital AKH, University of Vienna, Austria
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?