British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 3 466-467, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
P. M. Mayur, R. S. Shree, B. N. Gangadhar, D. K. Subbakrishna, N. Janakiramaiah and GSU. Rao
A report by the Royal College of Psychiatrists recommended avoiding
atropine premedication during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We have
examined the cardiovascular effects of ECT with or without atropine
premedication. Consenting patients (n = 30) were allocated randomly before
their third ECT session to receive atropine or no premedication. The rate
pressure product (RPP) was recorded before anaesthesia, before ECT stimulus
and at 1-min intervals thereafter for 5 min. Patients who did not receive
atropine had significantly lower RPP values after all stimulus recordings.
Administration of atropine or not explained 32% of the variance of summated
RPP after the stimulus. There was no clinically significant bradyarrhythmia
in those who did not receive atropine. Our findings support the
recommendation of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. The study suggests
that when threshold determination is not needed, avoiding atropine
effectively contains potentially harmful cardiovascular responses.
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
Atropine premedication and the cardiovascular response to electroconvulsive therapy
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore, India; Department of Neuroanaesthesia, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore, India; Department of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore, India
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. V. Tess and G. W. Smetana Medical Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., April 2, 2009; 360(14): 1437 - 1444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ding and P. F. White Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1351 - 1364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

