Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sockalingham, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sockalingham, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 3 463-465, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Mivacurium compared with succinylcholine in children with liver disease

D. W. Green, M. Fisher and I. Sockalingham
Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Relief, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS; Department of Anaesthetics, Queen Mary's Hospital, Sidcup, Kent; Department of Anaesthetics, The Lister Hospital, Stevenage, Herts

We have compared mivacurium and succinylcholine in 27 paediatric patients with mild (Child's A) to moderate (Child's B) liver disease undergoing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and injection of oesophageal varices, with 10 healthy children receiving mivacurium for ENT procedures. With mivacurium 0.2 mg kg-1, the severity of liver disease did not correlate with duration of block compared with controls (time from bolus to T1 25%, P = 0.74; T1 25% to T4:T1 > 0.7, P = 0.545). However, initial recovery (time to T1 25%, P = 0.002) and overall recovery (bolus to T4:T1 > 0.7, P = 0.004) from mivacurium- induced neuromuscular block correlated inversely with pre-existing concentrations of plasma cholinesterase. Conditions for tracheal intubation at 2 min with mivacurium were comparable with conditions at 1 min with succinylcholine in the liver patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.