Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hedenstierna, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hedenstierna, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 80, Issue 5 682-684, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Repeated vital capacity manoeuvres after cardiopulmonary bypass: effects on lung function in a pig model

L. Magnusson, S. Wicky, H. Tyden and G. Hedenstierna
Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden and Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Respiratory failure following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a major complication after cardiac surgery. A vital capacity inflation of the lungs, performed before the end of CPB, may improve gas exchange, but the necessity to repeat it is unclear. Therefore, we studied 18 pigs undergoing hypothermic CPB. A vital capacity manoeuvre (VCM) was performed in two groups and consisted of inflating the lungs for 15 s to 40 cm H2O at the end of CPB. In one group, VCM was repeated every hour. The third group served as controls. Atelectasis was studied by CT scan. Intrapulmonary shunt increased after bypass in the controls and improved spontaneously 3 h later without returning to baseline values. From 3 to 6 h after CPB, there was no more improvement and more than 10% atelectasis remained at 6 h. In contrast, the two groups treated before termination of CPB with VCM showed only minor atelectasis and no abnormal changes in gas exchange directly after bypass or later. We conclude that the protective effect of VCM remained for 6 h after bypass, and there was no extra benefit on gas exchange by repeating the VCM.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
E. M. Carvalho, E. A Gabriel, and T. A Salerno
Pulmonary Protection During Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Literature Review
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2008; 16(6): 503 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
L. C.H. John and I. M. Ervine
A study assessing the potential benefit of continued ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 14 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. S.H. Ng, A. A. Arifi, S. Wan, A. M.H. Ho, I. Y.P. Wan, E. M.C. Wong, and A. P.C. Yim
Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Impact on Cytokine Response and Cardiopulmonary Function
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 154 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. Weissman
Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. S.H. Ng, S. Wan, A. P.C. Yim, and A. A. Arifi
Pulmonary Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery*
Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1269 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Magnusson, A. Tenling, R. Lemoine, M. Hogman, H. Tyden, and G. Hedenstierna
The Safety of One, or Repeated, Vital Capacity Maneuvers During General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 702 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.