British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 76, Issue 3 428-434, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
J. B. Nyarwaya, S. Pierre, J. X. Mazoit, V. Umbrain, M. Romain, K. Samii and A. d'Hollander
We have compared cardiorespiratory variables in anaesthetized piglets whose
lungs were ventilated with oxygen in nitrous oxide (N2O group) or nitrogen
(N group) after right ventricular carbon dioxide boluses (0.5 or 1 ml kg-1;
n = 12) or slow graded injections (n = 6). Boluses affected all variables
studied significantly (P < 0.05) except mean systolic arterial pressure.
Significant changes in PE'CO2 (P = 0.012) and PaO2 (P = 0.048) values were
observed in the N2O group. Changes in PaCO2 were related to volumes of
injected carbon dioxide (P = 0.044). Boluses of 1.0 ml kg-1 induced severe
circulatory collapse in two piglets in the N2O group. Slow embolization
altered respiratory variables significantly (P < 0.001)). PaO2 decreased
significantly in the N2O group (P < 0.0001). Mean pulmonary arterial
pressure increased significantly over time (P = 0.001) and lasted longer in
the N2O group (P < 0.05). Volumes and time required to induce a 50%
increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure differed significantly between
groups (P < 0.05). We conclude that nitrous oxide worsened the effects
of rapid and slow carbon dioxide emboli on cardiopulmonary variables. Rapid
carbon dioxide embolism altered respiratory and haemodynamic variables,
while slow carbon dioxide embolism changed only respiratory variables.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Effects of carbon dioxide embolism with nitrous oxide in the inspired gas in piglets
Experimental Laboratory of the Department of Anaesthesiology, CUB Erasme, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ferrando, I. Garutti, C. Pulido, S. Diaz-Ruano, E. G. De Lucas, E. V. Nishanian, and N. G. Goudsouzian Carbon Dioxide Embolism in an Infant • Response Anesth. Analg., January 1, 1999; 88(1): 227 - 228. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
