Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abdulatif, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abdel-Gaffar, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abdulatif, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abdel-Gaffar, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 76, Issue 2 239-244, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Edrophonium antagonism of intense mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block in children

M. Abdulatif, A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Al-Sanabary and M. E. Abdel-Gaffar
Department of Anaesthesia, Cairo University, Egypt; King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

We have studied the time course of recovery after administration of edrophonium during intense mivacurium block in children aged 2-10 yr, using thumb acceleration in response to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. Forty-three children receiving alfentanil, propofol, nitrous oxide, isoflurane anaesthesia and mivacurium 0.2 mg kg-1 were allocated randomly to one of three groups. Patients in group 1 (n = 15) received edrophonium 1 mg kg-1, 2 min after maximum block (intense block group). At the time of administration of edrophonium in this group, there was no response to TOF stimulation (100% block) and the post-tetanic count was 10.7 (range 0-20). Patients in group 2 received the same dose of edrophonium after 10% recovery of the first twitch (T1) in the TOF (conventional reversal). Patients in group 3 (n = 13) recovered spontaneously. All patients developed complete suppression of twitch height in response to the bolus dose of mivacurium. All recovery times were measured from the point of maximum block after mivacurium. Mean time for 25% recovery of T1 (clinical duration) was 3.8 (SD 1.1) min in the intense block group. This was significantly shorter than the conventional reversal (8.3 (2.4) min) and spontaneous recovery (9.2 (3.5) min) groups (P < 0.001). The times for 75% and 90% recovery of T1 were shorter in the intense block group (9.4 (2.8), 12.3 (4.2) min) compared with the conventional (13.1 (3.8), 17.3 (4.8) min) and spontaneous recovery (14.9 (4.5), 17.9 (5.2) min) groups (P < 0.01). Total recovery time required for 70% recovery of the TOF ratio (T4/T1) was 8.8 (2.4) min in the intense block group. This was significantly shorter than the conventional reversal (11.9 (3.2) min) (P < 0.05) and spontaneous recovery (17.1 (4.0) min) groups (P < 0.001). Conventional reversal was associated with a shorter total recovery time compared with spontaneous recovery (P < 0.01). The recovery index (time interval between T1 25% and 75%) was comparable in groups 1-3 (5.5 (2.0), 4.8 (2.1) and 5.7 (1.4) min respectively). Ten minutes after development of maximum block, the numbers of patients who recovered adequately (TOF ratio 70% or more) were, respectively, 12 (80%), 8 (53%) and 1 (8%) in groups 1-3. We conclude that edrophonium antagonized intense (no response to TOF stimulation) mivacurium-induced block in children, with significant reduction in the recovery times of T1 and TOF ratio compared with conventional reversal and spontaneous recovery.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.