Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Boys, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Boys, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 76, Issue 1 61-65, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Randomized trial of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for maintenance of arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

D. G. Thomas, S. C. Robson, N. Redfern, D. Hughes and R. J. Boys
Department of Anaesthesia, Dryburn Hospital, Durham; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Department of Anaesthesia, RVI, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Department of Statistics, Univesity of Newcastle-upon-Tyne

Thirty-eight healthy women undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia at term were allocated randomly to receive boluses of either phenylephrine 100 micrograms or ephedrine 5 mg for maintenance of maternal arterial pressure. The indication for administration of vasopressor was a reduction in systolic pressure to < or = 90% of baseline values. Maternal arterial pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured every minute by automated oscillometry. Cardiac output (CO) was measured by cross-sectional and Doppler echocardiography before and after preloading with 1500 ml Ringer lactate solution and then every 2 min after administration of bupivacaine. Umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was measured using Doppler before and after spinal anaesthesia. The median (range) number of boluses of phenylephrine and ephedrine was similar; 6 (1-10) vs 4 (1- 8) respectively. Maternal systolic BP and CO changes were similar in both groups, but the mean [95% CI] maximum percentage change in maternal HR was larger in the phenylephrine group (-28.5 [-24.2, - 32.9]%) than in the ephedrine group (-14.4 [-10.6, -18.2]%). As a consequence atropine was required in 11/19 women in the phenylephrine group compared with 2/19 in the ephedrine group (P < 0.01). Mean umbilical artery pH [95% CI] was higher in the phenylephrine group (7.29 [7.28-7.30]) than in the ephedrine group (7.27 [7.25-7.28]). The results of the present study support the use of phenylephrine for maintenance of maternal arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Siddik-Sayyid, V. G. Nasr, S. K. Taha, R. A. Zbeide, J.-M. A. Shehade, A. A. Al Alami, F. H. Mokadem, F. W. Abdallah, A. S. Baraka, and M. T. Aouad
A Randomized Trial Comparing Colloid Preload to Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1219 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. Ngan Kee, A. Lee, K. S. Khaw, F. F. Ng, M. K. Karmakar, and T. Gin
A Randomized Double-Blinded Comparison of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine Infusion Combinations to Maintain Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Fetal Acid-Base Status and Hemodynamic Control
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1295 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Saravanan, M. Kocarev, R. C. Wilson, E. Watkins, M. O. Columb, and G. Lyons
Equivalent dose of ephedrine and phenylephrine in the prevention of post-spinal hypotension in Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2006; 96(1): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Hinchliffe and A. Norris
Management of failed intubation in a septic parturient
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2002; 89(2): 328 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, and T. Gin
A Quantitative, Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Ephedrine Versus Phenylephrine for the Management of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 920 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S.K. Backe and G. Lyons
Editorial II: Oxygen and elective Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2002; 88(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. Ngan Kee, K. S. Khaw, B. B. Lee, M. M.S Wong, and F. F. Ng
Metaraminol Infusion for Maintenance of Arterial Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effect of a Crystalloid Bolus
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2001; 93(3): 703 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. T. Ayorinde, P. Buczkowski, J. Brown, J. Shah, and D. J. Buggy
Evaluation of pre-emptive intramuscular phenylephrine and ephedrine for reduction of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension during Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. N. Kee, K. S. Khaw, B. B. Lee, T. K. Lau, and T. Gin
A Dose-Response Study of Prophylactic Intravenous Ephedrine for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2000; 90(6): 1390 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.