Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 15, 2009
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 103(3):359-363; doi:10.1093/bja/aep177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/3/359    most recent
aep177v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Apfel, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kolodzie, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Apfel, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kolodzie, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

Droperidol has comparable clinical efficacy against both nausea and vomiting

C. C. Apfel1,*, O. S. Cakmakkaya2, G. Frings3, P. Kranke4, A. Malhotra1, A. Stader1, A. Turan5, A. Biedler6 and K. Kolodzie1

1 Clinical Research Core, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, UCSF Mount Zion Hospital, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, C-447, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Bernhard Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany
4 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
5 Department of Outcomes Research, The Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
6 Katholische Kliniken Essen Nord, Essen, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: apfelc{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu or apfel{at}ponv.org

Background: Droperidol is commonly noted to be more effective at preventing postoperative nausea (PON) than vomiting (POV) and it is assumed to have a short duration of action. This may be relevant for clinical decisions, especially for designing multiple-drug antiemetic regimens.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a large multicentre trial. Within this trial, 1734 patients underwent inhalation anaesthesia and were randomly stratified to receive several antiemetic interventions according to a factorial design, one of which was droperidol 1.25 mg vs placebo. We considered differences to be significant when: (i) point estimates of one outcome are not within the limits of the confidence interval (CI) of the other outcome; and (ii) differences in risk ratio (also known as relative risks, RR) are at least 20%.

Results: Over 24 h, nausea was reduced from 42.9% in the control to 32.0% in the droperidol group, corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.75 (95% CI from 0.66 to 0.84). Vomiting was reduced from 15.6% to 11.8%, and therefore associated with a similar RR of 0.76 (0.59–0.96). In the early postoperative period (0–2 h), droperidol prevented nausea and vomiting similarly, with an RR of 0.57 (0.46–0.69) for nausea and 0.56 (0.37–0.85) for vomiting. In the late postoperative period (2–24 h), the RR was again similar with 0.83 (0.72–0.96) for nausea compared with 0.89 (0.66–1.18) for vomiting but significantly less compared with the early postoperative period.

Conclusions: We conclude that droperidol prevents PON and POV equally well, yet its duration of action is short-lived.

Keywords: anaesthesia, day-case; PONV


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.