Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on May 20, 2009
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 103(2):283-290; doi:10.1093/bja/aep124
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/2/283    most recent
aep124v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundstrøm, L. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundstrøm, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Board of Directors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

Avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents may increase the risk of difficult tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 103 812 consecutive adult patients recorded in the Danish Anaesthesia Database

L. H. Lundstrøm1,2,*, A. M. Møller1, C. Rosenstock3, G. Astrup4, M. R. Gätke1, J. Wetterslev2 and the Danish Anaesthesia Database

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
2 Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen Centre of Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
3 Department of Anaesthesia, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
4 Department of Anaesthesia Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Århus, Denmark

* Corresponding author. E-mail: lars_hyldborg{at}hotmail.com

Background: Previous studies indicate that avoiding neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) may be a risk factor for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI). We investigated whether avoiding NMBA was associated with DTI.

Methods: A cohort of 103 812 consecutive patients planned for tracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy was retrieved from the Danish Anaesthesia Database. We used an intubation score based upon the number of attempts, change from direct laryngoscopy to a more advanced technique, or intubation by a different operator. We retrieved data on age, sex, ASA physical status classification, priority of surgery, time of surgery, previous DTI, modified Mallampati score, BMI, and the use of NMBA. Using logistic regression, we assessed whether avoiding NMBA was associated with DTI.

Results: The frequency of DTI was 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0–5.3]%. In a univariate analysis, avoiding NMBA was associated with DTI, odds ratio (OR) 1.52 (95% CI: 1.43–1.61)%, P<0.0001. Using multivariate analysis, avoiding NMBA was associated with DTI, OR 1.48 (95% CI: 1.39–1.58), P<0.0001. Among patients intubated using NMBA, a multivariate analysis identified patients anaesthetized with only non-depolarizing NMBA to be more at risk for DTI than those anaesthetized with depolarizing NMBA alone.

Conclusions: Avoiding NMBA may increase the risk of DTI. However, confounding by indication may be a problem in this observational study and systematic reviews with meta-analysis or more randomized clinical trials are needed.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, laryngoscopy; complications, intubation tracheal; neuromuscular block


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BJA:

In the August 2009 BJA ...

BJA 2009 103: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Time for endotracheal intubation
Davide Cattano
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 28 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.