Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2009
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 102(5):692-697; doi:10.1093/bja/aep054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/5/692    most recent
aep054v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, P.
Right arrow Articles by Soni, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, P.
Right arrow Articles by Soni, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Board of Directors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

Ventilatory ratio: a simple bedside measure of ventilation

P. Sinha*, N. J. Fauvel, S. Singh and N. Soni

Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: p.sinha{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Measures of oxygenation are traditionally used to monitor the progress of patients on positive pressure ventilation. Although CO2 elimination depends on fewer variables, measures of CO2 elimination are comparatively overlooked except when monitoring patients who are difficult to ventilate. CO2 elimination is dependent upon CO2 production and alveolar ventilation, which together determine PaCO2. Alveolar ventilation is the efficient portion of minute ventilation (‘E’). In the clinical setting, problems with CO2 elimination are observed as increasing PaCO2, increasing minute ventilation, or both. In conventional tests of respiratory function, actual measurements are frequently compared with predicted measurements. However, this approach has rarely been applied to the measurement of ventilatory efficiency.

Methods: We have developed a ratio, called the ventilatory ratio (VR), which compares actual measurements and predicted values of minute ventilation and PaCO2.


Formula

Formula is taken to be 100 (ml kg–1 min–1) based on predicted body weight, and PaCO2predicted is taken to be 5 kPa.

Results: Inspection shows VR to be a unitless ratio that can be easily calculated at the bedside. VR is governed by carbon dioxide production and ventilatory efficiency in a logically intuitive way. We suggest that VR provides a simple guide to changes in ventilatory efficiency. A value close to 1 is predicted for normal individuals and an increasing value would correspond with worsening ventilation, increased CO2 production, or both.

Conclusions: VR is a new tool providing additional information for clinicians managing ventilated patients.

Keywords: carbon dioxide, elimination; ratio, ventilatory; ventilation, deadspace


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BJA:

In the May 2009 BJA ...

BJA 2009 102: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Ventilatory ratio equation
Ivan Hudecek
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 7 May 2009 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.