Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 102(4):561; doi:10.1093/bja/aep027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.-L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Board of Directors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

Is a decrease in capillary density dangerous?

S. Gelman

Boston, USA

E-mail: sgelman@partners.org

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Editor—I would agree with the authors’ interpretation of the interesting observations1 that not only propofol by itself, but associated hyperoxia and increases in sympathetic discharge, may affect the microcirculation. What are . . . [Full Text of this Article]

D. De Backer, M. Koch and J.-L. Vincent*

Brussels, Belgium

* E-mail: jlvincen@ulb.ac.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?