Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 101(6):841-847; doi:10.1093/bja/aen309
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forastiere, E.
Right arrow Articles by Simone, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forastiere, E.
Right arrow Articles by Simone, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine by On-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy

E. Forastiere1,*, M. Sofra1, D. Giannarelli2, L. Fabrizi1 and G. Simone3

1 Department of Anesthesiology
2 Department of Biostatistics
3 Department of Urology, ‘Regina Elena’ National Cancer Institute of Rome, Via Elio Chianesi 53, Italy

* Corresponding author. E-mail: puldet{at}gmail.com

Background: Block of parietal nociceptive afferent nerves using continuous wound infiltration with local anaesthetics may be beneficial in multimodal postoperative pain management. The effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after open nephrectomy was analysed in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods: One hundred and sixty-eight patients were randomized to either 0.5% ropivacaine (ON-Q group) or 0.9% NaCl (control group), using an elastomeric pump which delivered 4 ml h–1 over 48 h through two multiholed Soaker® catheters placed between the transverse and the internal oblique muscles and the s.c. space. All patients received a standard postoperative pain management protocol, including patient-controlled analgesic morphine and ketorolac. Outcomes measured over 48 h after operation were visual analogue scale (VAS) and incident (i) VAS pain scores, morphine consumption, and side-effects; time to bowel function recovery; and mean length of hospitalization.

Results: Side-effects were similar between the two groups. VAS and i-VAS pain scores, morphine consumption [11.5 (0.27) vs 21.8 (0.37) mg; P<0.001], time to bowel recovery [21.8 (0.4) vs 33.6 (0.9) h; P<0.001], and mean length of hospitalization [2.1 (0.03) vs 3.2 (0.1) days; P<0.001] were significantly reduced in the ON-Q group. Cost analysis revealed an overall savings of ~273 euros per patient in the ON-Q group.

Conclusions: Continuous surgical wound infusion with ropivacaine improved pain relief and accelerated recovery and discharge reducing overall costs of care.

Keywords: anaesthetics local, ropivacaine; pain, postoperative; surgery, urological


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BJA:

In the December 2008 BJA...

BJA 2008 101: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Harish, E. Forastiere, and M. Sofra
Low-dose infusion with 'surgical transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block' in open nephrectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 889 - 890.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Low dose infusion with "Surgical TAP block" in open nephrectomy
Rav Harish
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 13 Mar 2009 [Full text]
REPLY
Ester Forastiere, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 7 Apr 2009 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.