Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(2):300-301; doi:10.1093/bja/aem193
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melarkode, K.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melarkode, K.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Distribution of blood flow and ventilation in the lung: gravity is not the only factor

K. Melarkode

Cambridge, UK

E-mail: drkrishnanmr{at}gmail.com

Editor—I read with interest the review article by Galvin and colleagues1 on the distribution of blood flow and ventilation in the lung. The authors should be congratulated for their extensive review on this important aspect in respiratory physiology. However, I would like to highlight one important statement which I feel needs to be clarified.

The authors state that in the left lateral position, the total blood flow, total ventilation, and V/Q ratio can be less in the dependent lung than in the non-dependent lung (which is against the traditional gravitational model). This concept has been explained well by the authors. This point has been highlighted again in the penultimate paragraph on the implications in left lateral position. However, in the same paragraph, the authors make a contradictory statement and conclude that the V/Q ratio for the whole lung was greater in the left as opposed to the right lateral position. Could the authors kindly clarify this point?


 
M. Nirmalan*, I. Galvin and G. B. Drummond

Manchester and Edinburgh, UK

* E-mail: m.nirmalan{at}manchester.ac.uk

Editor—Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to respond to Dr Melarkode regarding our article.1 The traditional gravitational model would imply that in the lateral position both ventilation and perfusion will be greater in the dependent lung. However, the work by Chang and colleagues2 has demonstrated that this is not necessarily true. In fact, their work showed that in the left lateral position, both blood flow and ventilation were less in the dependent lung than in the non-dependent lung. Furthermore, the gravity-dependent vertical gradient in blood flow was greater in the right lateral than in the left lateral position. This observation was attributed to impaired blood flow in the dependent left lung in the left lateral position. These findings would strongly support the view that there are some underlying structural features (probably the weight of the heart and mediastinum) that impede blood flow and ventilation to the left lung in the left lateral position. The reduction in ventilation to some of the areas in the dependent left lung was sufficient to trigger hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Since hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is a generalized phenomenon, it affects blood flow to the entire lung. This independent reduction in blood flow would lead to an increase in the ventilation/perfusion ratio (as perfusion is reduced due to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction) as shown clearly by Chang and colleagues.2

References

1 Galvin I, Drummond GB, Nirmalan M. Distribution of blood flow and ventilation in the lung: gravity is not the only factor. Br J Anaesth (2007) 98:420–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Chang H, Lai-Fook SJ, Domino KB, et al. Spatial distribution of ventilation and perfusion in anaesthetised dogs in lateral postures. J Appl Physiol (2002) 92:745–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melarkode, K.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melarkode, K.
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?