Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on January 24, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 98(3):337-341; doi:10.1093/bja/ael368
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/337    most recent
ael368v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hamada, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hamada, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neuromuscular effects of sevoflurane in myasthenia gravis patients

K. Nitahara*, Y. Sugi, K. Higa, S. Shono and T. Hamada

Department of Anesthesiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan

* Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan. E-mail: nitahara{at}fukuoka-u.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Little information is available regarding the neuromuscular effects of sevoflurane in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We evaluated the neuromuscular effects of sevoflurane alone in patients with MG and in those with normal neuromuscular transmission.

METHODS: Sixteen patients with generalized type MG (MG group) and 12 otherwise healthy patients (control group) entered into this study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam followed by nitrous oxide in oxygen. Neuromuscular monitoring was recorded from the adductor pollicis muscle using electromyography with train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. After a stabilization period, and before sevoflurane administration, baseline T4/T1 was obtained and MG patients were classified as non-fade MG group (baseline T4/T1 ≥ 0.90) (n = 10) and fade MG group (baseline T4/T1 < 0.90) (n = 6). End-tidal sevoflurane concentration was kept constant at 1.7% for 30 min and doubled thereafter to 3.4% and maintained for a further 30 min.

RESULTS: Sevoflurane produced a concentration-dependent decrease in T1 and T4/T1 values. At 3.4% sevoflurane, T1 and T4/T1 decreased significantly from baseline values in all three groups. From baseline until the patient woke up from anaesthesia, the T4/T1 of the fade MG group was significantly lower than the other groups. At the end of anaesthesia, T4/T1 returned to values similar to the baseline in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS: During sevoflurane anaesthesia, concentration-dependent inhibition of neuromuscular transmission was observed in MG and control patients. The inhibitory effects of sevoflurane were more prominent in MG patients with baseline T4/T1 <0.90.

Keywords: anaesthetics volatile, sevoflurane; complications, myasthenia gravis; monitoring, neuromuscular function; neuromuscular transmission


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Inhibitory effects of volatile inhalation anaesthetics on neuromuscular transmission have been shown in in vitro1 2 and in vivo3 animal studies. In human, volatile inhalation anaesthetics have also been reported to reinforce the effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.4 5 The effect of volatile anaesthetics on neuromuscular transmission is a major concern in the anaesthetic management of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), with or without the use of a neuromuscular blocking agent. The effects of halothane and isoflurane on neuromuscular transmission have been reported in patients with MG.6 7

Sevoflurane has low blood/gas and tissue/gas solubility and may be a suitable volatile anaesthetic agent for general anaesthesia in patients with MG.8 9 However, little information is available regarding the neuromuscular effect of sevoflurane on MG patients. In this study, we investigated the effect of sevoflurane on neuromuscular transmission using electromyography (EMG) with train-of-four (TOF) stimulation in MG patients. We also investigated whether we could anticipate the degree of neuromuscular depressant effects of sevoflurane from the TOF ratio before administration. Indeed, the TOF ratio may reflect the fading of the response to four stimuli given every 0.5 s and the blockade of pre-junctional nicotinic acetylcholine receptors is thought to account for the fade that occurred during partial neuromuscular block.10


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Sixteen MG patients (MG group) and 12 otherwise healthy patients of ASA physical status I–II, free from neuromuscular disease (control group), who were scheduled to undergo elective minor surgery or thymectomy, entered into this study. Institutionally approved, written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The diagnosis of MG patients was confirmed by characteristic neurological findings, an anticholinesterase test, and electroneuromyographic assessment. All MG patients were classified as having a generalized type of MG. Current anticholinesterase and steroid therapy were continued until the morning of surgery. Four of 10 patients in the non- fade group and 4 of the 6 patients in the fade MG group received pyridostigmine before operation. All patients in the non-fade MG group and five of the six patients in the fade MG group received prednisolone before operation. Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies were detected in 8 of the 10 non-fade MG patients and in 5 of 6 the fade MG patients.

On arrival into the operating theatre, monitoring of pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and non-invasive arterial blood pressure was started. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2–2.5 mg kg–1, fentanyl 2–4 µg kg–1, and midazolam 0.04–0.08 mg kg–1, followed by nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen. The trachea was intubated without the use of a neuromuscular blocking agent. Patients were ventilated mechanically to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension within 4.6–5.3 kPa. Tympanic temperature was maintained at 37.0 (1.0)°C with a heating blanket.

Neuromuscular monitoring was recorded from the adductor pollicis muscle using EMG (RelaxographTM, Datex, Helsinki, Finland) with stimulation of the ulnar nerve of the immobilized forearm. The baseline calibration sequence was performed immediately after loss of consciousness. Supramaximal stimuli and control electromyographic responses were established. Neuromuscular transmission was measured using TOF stimuli every 20 s. The amplitude of the first twitch response (T1) of each train, compared with the control electromyographic response and the TOF ratio (T4/T1) was recorded automatically.

Baseline T1 and T4/T1 were obtained after a 15-min stabilization period. MG patients with T4/T1 ≥0.90 and T4/T1 < 0.90 were classified as the non-fade and fade MG groups, respectively. The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was kept constant at 1.7% for 30 min and then doubled to 3.4% and maintained for a further 30 min. After 30 min of 3.4% sevoflurane, the concentration was adjusted during surgery at the discretion of the anaesthetist. The neuromuscular effects during the study were assessed at the end of a 15-min stabilization period (baseline), at the end of 1.7% sevoflurane, at the end of 3.4% sevoflurane, and when the patient woke up.

Hand skin temperature was monitored using a surface probe placed on the palm. Non-invasive blood pressure was monitored every 5 min, and when systolic blood pressure decreased to <80 mm Hg, ephedrine 4 mg i.v. was given. The trachea was extubated when the patient was fully awake and had an inspiratory force >25 cm H2O and a vital capacity of at least 10 ml kg–1.

Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean (SD), unless otherwise stated. Data within groups were analysed over time by repeated-measure analysis of variance. Data between groups were analysed by one-way analysis of variance. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables. Student–Newman–Keuls test was used for multiple comparisons. All tests were two-sided. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
No significant differences were noted among the groups with regard to age, height, weight, disease duration, or duration of surgery (Table 1). After 15-min stabilization, 6 of the 16 MG patients had baseline T4/T1 less than 0.9. Thus, 10 patients were classified as the non-fade MG group and 6 as the fade group. The mean T4/T1 at baseline was 0.99 (0.02) in the control group (n = 12), 0.97 (0.04) in the non-fade MG group (n = 10), and 0.81 (0.11) in the fade MG group (n = 6). No significant differences were noted between the non-fade and fade MG patients with regard to the daily doses of pyridostigmine and prednisolone (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference with regard to antibody titres between the two MG groups [non-fade group 36.8 (51.5) nmol litre–1, range 1.5–162; fade group 277.4 (518.5) nmol litre–1, range 8.4–1200].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Patient details. Values are presented as mean (SD), or number of patients. Data did not differ significantly between groups

 
Hand skin temperature did not differ significantly between the three groups at any observation time. Hand skin temperature (mean of all patients) increased significantly after induction of anaesthesia from 32.5 to 34.8°C; thereafter, it did not change until the end of surgery.

During sevoflurane anaesthesia, T4/T1 decreased in a concentration-dependent manner in all three groups (Table 2, Fig. 1). At 3.4% sevoflurane, T4/T1 decreased significantly from baseline values to 0.70 (0.07) in the control group, 0.71 (0.19) in the non-fade MG group, and 0.43 (0.28) in the fade MG group, respectively (P < 0.01). At the end of anaesthesia, T4/T1 returned to values not significantly different from baseline in all three groups. T4/T1 in the fade MG group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups at all observation points (P < 0.01). The degree of T4/T1 depression from baseline was significantly greater in the fade MG group [22.7 (21.0)% at 1.7% and 48.5 (32.2)% at 3.4%] compared with control group [0.7 (1.6)% and 29.8 (6.9)%] and non-fade MG group [4.5 (5.7)% and 22.7 (12.7)%], P < 0.01 at 1.7% sevoflurane, P < 0.05 at 3.4% sevoflurane.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig 1 T4/T1 at the end of 15 min stabilization (baseline), at the end of 1.7% sevoflurane, at the end of 3.4% sevoflurane, and when the patient woke up after anaesthesia (awake) in control, non-fade MG, and fade MG groups. *P < 0.01 compared with control and non-fade MG group. #P < 0.01 compared with baseline.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Change in TOF ratios. Values are presented as mean (SD). *P < 0.01 compared with control and non-fade MG groups. #P < 0.01 compared with baseline

 
The mean T1 (% of control) at baseline was 94.8 (5.0) in the control group, 92.1 (10.8) in the non-fade MG group, and 92.0 (12.1) in the fade MG group. During sevoflurane anaesthesia, T1 also decreased in a concentration-dependent manner in all three groups (Table 3). At 3.4% sevoflurane, T1 decreased significantly from baseline to 75.7 (2.9) in the control group, 73.3 (11.8) in the non-fade MG group, and 52.7 (18.8) in the fade MG group (P < 0.01). T1 in the fade MG group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 1.7% sevoflurane (P < 0.05), and less than that in the other two groups at 3.4% sevoflurane (P < 0.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Changes in T1 (% of control). Values are presented as mean (SD). *P < 0.05 compared with control group. {dagger}P < 0.01 compared with control and non-fade MG groups. #P < 0.01, {ddagger}P < 0.05 compared with baseline

 
Tracheal extubation was achieved at the end of surgery in all patients on reaching a maximum inspiratory force >25 cm H2O and a vital capacity of ≥ 10 ml kg–1.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
In our study, a concentration-dependent T4/T1 depression was observed in MG patients during sevoflurane anaesthesia. At 3.4% sevoflurane, which is approximately equal to 2 MAC (maximum admissible concentration) in 40-yr-old adults,11 T4/T1 decreased to 0.43 in the fade MG group and to 0.71 in the non-fade MG group. Nilsson and colleagues6 reported the effects of halothane on neuromuscular transmission in MG patients. In their study, after 15 min of 1.9 MAC halothane, T4/T1 of EMG responses in MG patients decreased to 0.72,6 which is similar to the value in non-fade MG patients at 3.4% sevoflurane in our study. Nilsson and Muller7 also studied the effects of isoflurane in MG patients and reported that after 15 min of 1.9 MAC isoflurane, T4/T1 of EMG responses in MG patients decreased to 0.59, which is in the middle of non-fade and fade MG values at 3.4% sevoflurane in our study. However, comparison between the above studies by Nilsson and colleagues and ours is difficult, as above studies did not differentiate between non-fade and fade MG patients and the duration of volatile anesthetics administered and the choice of other anaesthetics are different.

Our study suggests that pre-anaesthetic T4/T1 values can predict the degree of depression of the neuromuscular transmission by sevoflurane during surgery in patients with MG. Neuromuscular function of individual MG patients is difficult to predict from standard clinical parameters such as duration of disease and Osserman's classification (diagnosed by the presence of ocular muscle weakness and the degree of muscle weakness affecting muscles other than ocular ones). The maintenance dose of prednisolone and anticholinesterase or the titres of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies are not good predictors. No significant differences were noted between the non-fade and fade MG patients with regard to the daily doses of pyridostigmine and prednisolone, or in the antibody titres. However, monitoring of TOF ratio before administration of anaesthetics may give a valuable predictor for the neuromuscular function at the time of induction of anaesthesia. Reduced requirement of atracurium in MG patients with pre-anesthetic T4/T1 <0.9 has been reported during propofol and fentanyl anaesthesia12 and requirement for non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs is reduced with volatile inhalation anaesthetics compared with balanced anaesthesia.5 13 14 Sevoflurane has been shown to potentiate the effect of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs more than the other volatile anaesthetics (e.g. halothane and isoflurane).14 15 Therefore, special attention is required during sevoflurane anaesthesia in cases where the non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs are necessary in MG patients, especially in patients whose preoperative T4/T1 is <0.9. Before sevoflurane administration, the fade in MG patients can be evaluated by monitoring the TOF ratios after the stabilization period with an i.v. agent such as propofol.

In our study, a significant decrease in T4/T1 at approximately 2 MAC sevoflurane was observed not only in MG patients but also in control patients. Caldwell and colleagues16 also reported that in volunteers; T4/T1 decreased significantly at 12% desflurane (i.e. at 1.67 MAC). In contrast, Nilsson and colleagues6 7 reported that 1.9 MAC of halothane and isoflurane had no inhibitory effects on T4/T1 in control patients. Also, Fogdall and Miller17 reported that in patients with normal neuromuscular transmission receiving enflurane at 1.67 MAC, no fade was observed at a frequency of 50 Hz. In an animal study, Suzuki and colleagues3 compared the neuromuscular blocking effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in cats and showed that only sevoflurane, at 2 MAC, caused fade responses during 2 Hz stimulation. The site of action of volatile anaesthetics that produces inhibition of neuromuscular transmission is proposed to be both pre- and post-synaptic.18 19 However, drugs which act on acetylcholine receptors are thought to cause fade of muscle contraction responses during high-frequency stimulation by affecting mainly the pre-synaptic component.19 Our results suggest that sevoflurane may have a significant depressant action at pre-synaptic sites at neuromuscular junctions.

In our study, the concentration-dependent depression of T1 by sevoflurane was also observed. However, the drift in T1 in EMG responses has been reported after induction of general anaesthesia and is attributable to various mechanisms (e.g. change of muscle temperature and change of forearm position).20 21 As a result, at the end of anaesthesia, the T1 of EMG responses may only recover to 70–80% of control values in spite of TOF ratios >0.90, and this change varies greatly among individuals.21 In the present study, the T1 changes were within about 40% of control values in all groups. It is difficult to assess the changes of T1 induced by sevoflurane between and within groups with EMG, as we could not know how much drift is included in T1 changes. However, it is generally accepted that T4/T1 measured with EMG and those recorded with the mechanomyography (gold standard) provide similar information.22

After discontinuation of sevoflurane, TOF ratios returned to values not significantly different from baseline in the three groups of patients. Tracheal extubation was achieved in all MG patients at the end of surgery with adequate ventilation. Low blood/gas and tissue/gas solubility might be partly responsible for this rapid recovery from neuromuscular depression by sevoflurane.

In conclusion, sevoflurane has an inhibitory effect on neuromuscular transmission in both MG and control patients. The inhibitory effects of sevoflurane were more prominent in MG patients with baseline T4/T1 < 0.90 than in those with baseline T4/T1 ≥ 0.90 and in control patients.


    Acknowledgement
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
This work was supported by grants from the Clinical Research Foundation, Fukuoka, Japan.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
1 Kennedy R and Galindo A. (1975) Neuromuscular transmission in a mammalian preparation during exposure to enflurane. Anesthesiology 42:432–42.[ISI][Medline]

2 Bhattacharyya BJ, Tsen K, Sokoll MD. (1993) Age-induced alteration of neuromuscular transmission: effect of halothane. Eur J Pharmacol 254:97–104.[CrossRef]

3 Suzuki T, Nagai H, Katsmata T, Ogawa S, Suzuki H. (1996) Comparative neuromuscular inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics. Masui 45:599–607.[Medline]

4 Naguib M, Seraj M, Abdulrazik E. (1992) Pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during nitrous oxide-fentanyl, enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane anesthesia in surgical patients. Anesth Analg 75:193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Suzuki T, Munakata N, Watanabe N, Katsumata N, Saeki S, Ogawa S. (1999) Augmentation of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anaesthesia: comparison with balanced anaesthesia using propofol or midazolam. Br J Anaesth 83:485–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Nilsson E, Paloheimo M, Muller K, Heinonen J. (1989) Halothane-induced variability in the neuromuscular transmission of patients with myasthenia gravis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 33:395–401.[ISI][Medline]

7 Nilsson E and Muller K. (1990) Neuromuscular effects of isoflurane in patients with myasthenia gravis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34:126–31.[ISI][Medline]

8 Strum DP and Eger EI II. (1987) Partition coefficients for sevoflurane in human blood, saline, and olive oil. Anesth Analg 66:654–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Eager EI II. (2000) Uptake and distribution. In Miller RD (Ed.). Anesthesia 5th Edn. (Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia) pp. 74–95.

10 Bowman WC. (2006) Neuromuscular block. Br J Pharmacol 147:S277–86.

11 Mapleson WW. (1996) Effect of age on MAC in humans: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 76:179–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Mann R, Blobner M, Jelen-Esselborn S, Busley R, Wener C. (2000) Preanesthetic train-of-four fade predicts the atracurium requirement of myasthenia gravis patients. Anesthesiology 93:346–50.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

13 Naguib M, Seraj M, Abdulrazik E. (1992) Pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during nitrous oxide-fentanyl, enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane anesthesia in surgical patients. Anesth Analg 75:193–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Lowry DW, Liao SY, Tong JH, Liu JH, An G, Luo LK. (1998) Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 87:936–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Woloszczuk-Gebicka B, Lapczynski T, Wierzejski W. (2001) The influence of halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane on rocuronium infusion in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:73–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

16 Caldwell JE, Laster MJ, Magorian T, et al. (1991) The neuromuscular effects of desflurane, alone and combined with pancuronium or succinylcholine in humans. Anesthesiology 74:412–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

17 Fogdall RP and Miller RD. (1975) Neuromuscular effects of enflurane, alone and combination with d-tubocurarine, pancuronium, and succinylcholine, in man. Anesthesiology 42:173–8.[ISI][Medline]

18 Dilger JP, Vidal AM, Mody HI, Liu Y. (1994) Evidence for direct actions of general anesthetics on an ion channel protein: a new look at a unified mechanism of action. Anesthesiology 81:431–2.[ISI][Medline]

19 Bowman WC. (1980) Prejunctional and postjunctional cholinoceptors at the neuromuscular junction. Anesth Analg 59:935–43.[Free Full Text]

20 Smith DC and Booth JV. (1994) Influence of muscle temperature and forearm position on evoked electromyography in the hand. Br J Anaesth 72:407–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21 Kopman AF, Justo MD, Mallhi MU, Abara CE, Neuman GG. (1995) The influence of changes in hand temperature on the indirectly evoked electromyogram of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Can J Anaesth 42:1090–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22 Engbaek J, Ostergaard D, Viby-Mogensen J, Skovgaard LT. (1989) Clinical recovery and train-of-four ratio measured mechanically and electromyographically following atracurium. Anesthesiology 71:391–5.[ISI][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. L. Kwak, Y. S. Choi, J. K. Shim, E. M. Choi, K. Nitahara, Y. Sugi, K. Higa, S. Shono, and T. Hamada
Persistent train-of-four fade in myasthenia gravis patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 724 - 725.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Persistent train-of-four fade in myasthenia gravis patients after sevoflurane anesthesia
Young Lan Kwak, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 10 Jan 2008 [Full text]
Re: Persistent train-of-four fade in myasthenia gravis patients after sevoflurane anesthesia
Keiichi Nitahara, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 12 Feb 2008 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/337    most recent
ael368v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hamada, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hamada, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?