BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008 100(4):478-484; doi:10.1093/bja/aen015
Infusion of hypertonic saline before elective hysterectomy: effects on cytokines and stress hormones
1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
2 Institute for Inflammation Research IIR 7521, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
* Corresponding author. E-mail: jaakp{at}dadlnet.dk
Accepted for publication January 15, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: Infusion of hypertonic saline provides early haemodynamic benefits and may affect the immune system. It is unknown if infusion of hypertonic saline affects plasma cytokines and stress hormones after surgery.
Methods: Sixty-two women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were randomized in a double-blind study to infusion of NaCl 7.5% (HS), NaCl 0.9% (NS4), both 4 ml kg–1, or NaCl 0.9% 32 ml kg–1 (NS32) over 20 min. Blood was collected at baseline, 1, 4, and 24 h after surgery (n=34) for the determination of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-1ra, and tumour necrosis factor-
. Serum cortisol and vasopressin were measured at these time points and 48 h after operation. Epinephrine and norepinephrine (n=26) were quantified at baseline, after infusion, 25 min after incision, 1, and 4 h after surgery. Finally, C-reactive protein was measured at baseline, 24, and 48 h after surgery.
Results: Surgery and anaesthesia induced well-reported changes in the concentrations of cytokines and hormones. The concentration of norepinephrine briefly increased after infusion of HS and NS32 but not NS4 (P<0.05). Epinephrine was increased 25 min after incision in Group NS32 compared with the other groups (P<0.05). No other differences were found between the groups.
Conclusions: Infusion of a clinically relevant dose of hypertonic saline before hysterectomy appears to have limited effect on the postoperative concentration of selected plasma cytokines and the hormonal stress-response.
Keywords: clinical trials; fluids, i.v.; hormones, adrenal; stress; surgery, laparotomy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue injury causes immunological and neuroendocrine changes.1 Cytokine and hormone secretion boosts the immune system, causes salt and water retention, and mobilizes substrate to provide energy for the injured body.1 Although the stress response seems beneficial for the wounded animal, excessive activation may be deleterious.2
Infusion of hypertonic saline with or without added colloids efficiently increases plasma volume.3 4 Studies in isolated human leucocytes and animal models of haemorrhagic shock suggest that the induced hypertonicity may moderate the inflammatory5 and hormonal stress responses.6 The balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene expression, production, and secretion seem to be shifted in an anti-inflammatory direction by hypertonicity or hypertonic saline infusion.7–12
Despite these promising laboratory results, only few human trials have hitherto been conducted.13–16 In a recent clinical trial, Rizoli and colleagues14 showed that a single 250 ml dose of NaCl 7.5% with Dextran 6% administered to blunt trauma patients in haemorrhagic shock reduced the production of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-
in circulating monocytes and macrophages while increasing anti-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist and IL-10 concentrations. The usual shock-induced increase in circulating norepinephrine was prevented with no effect on adrenal steroid concentrations.14
Like trauma, surgery activates the neuroendocrine stress response.1 Thus, we sought to establish whether infusion of hypertonic saline 7.5%, 4 ml kg–1, a clinically relevant dose and the dose used in most trauma trials,4 would affect the plasma concentration of common stress hormones and cytokines. We hypothesized that the infusion of hypertonic saline before abdominal hysterectomy would ameliorate the postoperative stress response and change the cytokine profile in an anti-inflammatory direction.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data described here were collected during a study on the effect of hypertonic saline infusion on the cellular immune response after surgery.17 The study protocol has been described previously.17 The Regional Ethical Review Committee (VN 2000/145) and The Danish Medicines Agency (2612-1491) approved the study.
Eligibility
Patients, undergoing elective open abdominal hysterectomy, were invited to take part in the study. The criteria for inclusion were an age between 18 and 65 yr, non-malignant disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Scale class I–II. The exclusion criteria were: BMI above 35 kg m–2, heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Group III–IV], renal failure (P-creatinine >120 µmol litre–1), anaemia (B-haemoglobin <11.6 g dl–1), diabetes mellitus, and use of medications known to affect immune function within 48 h of participation in the study. These included glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and histamine antagonists. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Procedure
Sixty-two women were included in the study. Subjects fasted overnight and received acetaminophen 1 g orally in addition to their daily medication. Patients aged 40 yr of age and older (n=19) received dalteparin 2500 IU s.c. for thromboprophylaxis. Oral diazepam 5 mg was allowed at the discretion of the attending nurses and was administered to six, four, and four patients in Groups HS, NS4, and NS32, respectively. Patients were studied in the operating theatre on the morning of surgery. A cubital vein of each arm was cannulated for blood sampling and fluid infusion. Study group allocations were placed in sealed, opaque, randomly assorted envelopes, which were opened by a hospital staff member who was not one of the study investigators. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either NaCl 7.5%, 4 ml kg–1 (The Central Pharmacy, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, Group HS, n=21), NaCl 0.9%, 4 ml kg–1 (Group NS4, n=21), or NaCl 0.9%, 32 ml kg–1 (Group NS32, n=20) (The Hospital Pharmacies in Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark) infused by pump at a constant rate over 20 min (IVAC 591, IVAC, CA, USA). Patients, surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, and laboratory technicians were blinded to the type of the fluid given to each patient. Owing to risk of potential fluid overload, the maximal infused volume did not exceed a volume corresponding to 75 kg, which was the case in five, seven, and five patients in Groups HS, NS4, and NS32, respectively. Between termination of the test fluid infusion and extubation, we infused NaCl 0.9%, 5 ml kg–1 h–1 which was reduced to 1.5 ml kg–1 h–1 during the stay in the recovery room.
We recorded heart rate, arterial pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation every 2 min during the infusion and every 5 min during anaesthesia and surgery.
Patients were anaesthetized with fentanyl 3 µg kg–1 and thiopental 3–5 mg kg–1. Intubation was facilitated by rocuronium 0.6 mg kg–1. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1–3% in oxygen and air and supplementary fentanyl 100 µg was given when judged necessary by the anaesthetist. Cefuroxime 1.5 g was administered i.v. as antibiotic prophylaxis to all patients.
Postoperative pain was treated with oral acetaminophen 1 g, four times daily, tramadol 50 mg, three times daily, and i.v. morphine, or ketobemidon. We treated nausea with i.v. ondansetron 1 mg and droperidol 0.5 mg.
Blood chemistry
Venous blood was collected at baseline (T0), after the saline infusion (T-inf), 25 min after incision (T-surg), and 1 (T1), 11 (T11), 24 (T24), and 48 h (T48) after skin closure for the determination of haemoglobin, plasma sodium, chloride, and potassium concentrations which were measured according to laboratory routines in our hospital by means of a Vitros950 (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Birkerød, Denmark). Plasma osmolality was measured at T0, T-inf, T1, T24, and T48 by freezing point depression (The Advanced Osmometer Model 3900, Advanced Instruments, MA, USA).
Serum cortisol
Cortisol was measured in serum from venous blood at T0, T-inf, T1, T4, T24, and T48 by a solid-phase, time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (AutoDELFIA® Cortisol Kit, PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Turku, Finland). The analytical sensitivity of this kit was 15 nmol litre–1.
Plasma C-reactive protein
C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined by a DadeBehring BNII nephelometer (Marburg, Germany).
Serum vasopressin
We measured vasopressin in serum from venous blood at T0, T1, T4, T24, and T48 by radioimmunoassay after Sep Pak extraction (Waters Corporation, MA, USA) as described elsewhere.18 The antibody was kindly donated by Dr Peter Bie, Odense, Denmark. The detection limit was 0.26 pg ml–1.
Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine
Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine were measured by a radioenzymatic assay described in detail elsewhere.19 The sensitivity of the assay was 0.3 and 0.5 pg ml–1 for epinephrine and norepinephrine, respectively, calculated as three times the standard deviation of the analytical blank.
Plasma cytokines
The plasma concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF
were quantified by means of a cytometric bead array assay (Human Inflammation CBA, BD Biosciences Pharmingen, Copenhagen, Denmark) using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA). The detection limits for these cytokines ranged from 1.1 to 4.1 pg ml–1. The concentration of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) was measured by a previously described solid-phase sandwich ELISA using monospecific polyclonal rabbit antibodies to purified recombinant cytokines.20 The sensitivity limit of the ELISA was 60 pg ml–1.
Statistical analysis
If a substance was non-detectable, the measurement was assigned a value corresponding to the detection limit of the test. This was the case for measurements of CRP, epinephrine, cytokines, and vasopressin. The frequency of non-detectable measurements in each group was compared by the
2 test at each time point. Friedman's test for multiple related non-parametric data was used on each group to test for changes over time (SPSS 10.05, Chicago, IL, USA). Baseline characteristics, the median values at each time point, and the median changes between each of two consecutive time points were compared by the Kruskal–Wallis test. The hypothesis was that the preoperatively infused fluid affected the measured variables. Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range). P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sixty-two patients were included and randomized. Four patients were excluded from the final analysis. One patient did not wish to finish the study (Group HS), one patient (Group HS) experienced an anaphylactoid reaction towards fentanyl or rocuronium (the patient was tested later and found to be allergic to these drugs), one patient was transferred to another hospital before finishing follow-up (Group NS4), and one patient underwent reoperation after 24 h due to postoperative bleeding (Group NS32). The study population baseline characteristics of the remaining 58 patients are shown in Table 1. None of the patients received any blood products during the study.
|
Plasma electrolytes, osmolality, and blood haemoglobin
The changes in plasma sodium, chloride, potassium, osmolality, and blood haemoglobin have previously been published.17 Briefly, median (IQR) plasma sodium concentration increased by 9 (8–11) mmol litre–1 to a maximum of 151 (149–152) mmol litre–1 after infusion of hypertonic saline corresponding to an increase in plasma osmolality of 18 (14–20) mmol kg–1 to a maximum of 302 (299–306) mmol kg–1. Both variables returned to normal after 24 h. Potassium concentration decreased 0.3 (0.2–0.5) mmol litre–1 in all groups between 24 and 48 h after surgery. Haemoglobin concentration decreased a total of 1.9 g dl–1 (1.3–2.3) in all groups within the first 24 h with a temporary increase 1 h after surgery and stabilization between 24 and 48 h in all groups.
Serum cortisol
The cortisol concentration (Fig. 1A) changed over time in a similar fashion in all groups (P<0.001 for the effect of time in all groups). It decreased after test fluid infusion, peaked 1 h after surgery, and returned towards baseline after 24 h. The decrease after test fluid infusion was greater in Group NS32 than in the other groups (P<0.01).
|
Plasma CRP
CRP (Fig. 1B) changed over time in all groups (P<0.001, for the effect of time in all groups) with no significant differences between the groups at any time. The concentration increased from 4 (4–4) mg litre–1 in all groups to 57 (42–73) mg litre–1, 86 (45–107) mg litre–1, and 61 (31–91) mg litre–1 after 48 h in Groups HS, NS4, and NS32, respectively.
Plasma vasopressin
Vasopressin (Fig. 1C) changed over time in all groups (P<0.001 for the effect of time in all groups) with no significant differences between the groups at any time. The concentration rose from 0.76 (0.42–1.43) pg ml–1 at baseline to 5.3 (3.0–10.6) pg ml–1 1 h after surgery and was still more than double baseline after 48 h.
Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine
The concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine changed significantly over time in all groups (Fig. 2). The concentration of both hormones peaked 1 h after surgery. In patients who received normal saline 32 ml kg–1, the concentration of epinephrine increased significantly during surgery when compared with the other groups (P<0.05). The concentration of norepinephrine increased significantly after infusion in patients who received hypertonic saline or normal saline 32 ml kg–1 whereas it was unchanged after infusion of normal saline 4 ml kg–1. There were no other differences between the groups at any time point. The concentrations of both hormones were measured at 24 and 48 h in six women, two in each group, in addition to the time points shown in Figure 2. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were decreased at 24 h and returned to baseline at 48 h, whereas epinephrine concentrations had returned to baseline at 24 and 48 h with no obvious difference between the groups (data not shown).
|
Cytokines
Changes in cytokine concentrations are shown in Figure 3. The concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1ra increased significantly in all groups after surgery. IL-10 concentrations only increased significantly after surgery in Group NS4. The concentration of IL-8 was higher at baseline and 1 h after surgery in Group HS compared with the other groups (P<0.01). No other differences between the groups were seen for any of the cytokines. TNF
, IL-1β, and IL-12 were undetectable in 30–80% of the measurements at each time point with no significant difference in the frequency of this between the groups (P>0.05 for all,
2 test). Six pilot samples, two in each group showed that there was little difference in the measured cytokines between 24 and 48 h. Consequently, we did not measure cytokines at 48 h.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effects of hypertonic saline infusion in a clinical relevant dose on circulating cytokines and stress hormones after surgery. Abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia elicited a balanced and self-limiting pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine response. CRP increased and a classic hormonal stress response was observed with temporary increases in plasma cortisol, vasopressin, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. The response seemed largely unaffected by the volume and tonicity of the preoperatively infused fluids.
As in the present study, previous studies found no significant effect of hypertonic saline infusion on pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokine concentrations in plasma from healthy women16 or in the supernatant above monocytes from hypotensive trauma patients.15 In contrast, Rizoli and colleagues14 found that a single dose of 250 ml of NaCl 7.5%, Dextran-70 6%, added to the standard resuscitation regimen of patients sustaining traumatic haemorrhagic shock, resulted in a reduced intracellular production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, TNF
, and increased synthesis of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-10 and IL-1ra, in peripheral blood monocytes. Methodological differences may help to explain these different findings, that is, plasma and the supernatant do not necessarily reflect changes in intracellular cytokines.21 However, it may also be, as suggested by Rizoli, that the anti-inflammatory properties of hypertonic saline are only evident in the presence of an intense inflammatory stimulus. This notion is corroborated by recent studies in severely haemorrhaged rats22 and isolated human immune cells.10 The latter study suggests that hypertonicity impedes cytokine synthesis in LPS-stimulated cells but not in quiescent cells.10 It is worth noting that the concentration of IL-6 in trauma patients, which correlates with injury severity, exceeds the maximum concentration measured in this study many times.23 Thus, the inflammatory stimulus elicited by abdominal hysterectomy during general anaesthesia may be too small to show an anti-inflammatory effect of hypertonic saline.
The primary sources of cytokines include the different leucocyte subtypes.24 The circulating number of these cells may therefore affect the concentration of the measured cytokines. This is unlikely to be the case in the present study. We have reported elsewhere that only small differences were found between the groups in the number of circulating neutrophils, monocytes, natural killer cells, and lymphocyte subtypes.17 It is notable, though the groups differed slightly at baseline, that the increase in IL-8 and the concentration 1 h after surgery seemed higher in the HS group than in the other groups. This is consistent with studies on isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which showed that hypertonicity dose-dependently increases IL-8 gene expression25 and IL-8 protein synthesis.25 26 IL-8 is a chemokine that attracts neutrophils.21 There was, however, no effect on the number of neutrophils in the blood.17
We observed brief peaks in the concentration of circulating norepinephrine after infusion of hypertonic saline and normal saline 32 ml kg–1. It has recently been shown that infusion of hypertonic saline 3%, 9 ml kg–1 over 60 min in healthy volunteers, raising plasma osmolality to levels comparable with those seen in our study, increased the concentration of plasma norepinephrine.27 Our data show that this increase may be a result of increased intravascular volume rather than an effect of the induced hypertonicity alone since the plasma norepinephrine increased in both the HS and the NS32 groups (Fig. 2). It is conceivable that the increased intravascular volume facilitates microperfusion and thereby a washout of norepinehrine from neuroeffector junctions.28 In contrast, Boldt and colleagues13 found that doubling the wedge pressure by the infusion of hydroxyethyl starch 6% in hypertonic saline 7.2% in cardiac patients attenuated the increase in plasma norepinephrine during cardiopulmonary bypass. Furthermore, Rizoli and colleagues14 found that infusion of NaCl 7.5%, Dextran-70 6% prevented the rise in circulating norepinehrine elicited by haemorrhage and resuscitation. The available data suggest that infusion of hypertonic saline in relatively unstressed individuals may increase plasma norepinephrine, whereas the increase, caused by major stress such as cardiopulmonary bypass and haemorrhagic shock, is blunted.
Blood loss was greater and the duration of surgery was longer in the NS32 group compared with the other groups (Table 1). We cannot exclude the possibility that this may have affected our result and it may explain the observed increase in epinephrine during surgery in Group NS32. Previous studies suggest that the infusion of large amounts of isotonic saline may increase bleeding and use of blood products during surgery.29 30
We observed a seven-fold increase in vasopressin to a maximum of 5.3 (3.0–10.6) pg ml–1 1 h after surgery. The increase was unrelated to the tonicity of the infused fluid. We have previously measured circulating vasopressin after infusion of hypertonic saline. Twenty healthy women were randomized to infusion over 10 min of NaCl 7.5% or normal saline, both 4 ml kg–1. Vasopressin increased from median (IQR) 0.35 (0.28–0.62) pg ml–1 at baseline to 3.46 (1.87–5.68) pg ml–1 30 min after the start of the hypertonic saline infusion compared with a small decrease from 0.37 (0.07–0.64) to 0.26 (0–0.56) pg ml–1 in the control group (unpublished results). Together these results show that infusion of hypertonic saline increases circulating vasopressin but that the surgical stress elicited by laparotomy is an even stronger stimulus that may blunt the effect of hypertonicity. This finding is in accordance with previous studies which showed that circulating vasopressin concentrations did not correlate with plasma osmolality after infusion of hypertonic saline during cardiopulmonary bypass13 31 or resuscitation of burn patients.32
We studied relatively healthy normovolaemic women undergoing a standardized surgical procedure under general anaesthesia. Abdominal hysterectomy induces well-described changes in the inflammatory cytokines and stress hormones similar to those seen after trauma33 and other kinds of major surgery.1 13 24 34 It is generally accepted that the anaesthesia may influence the stress response, but that the extent of the surgical trauma is more important.35 In order to minimize bias from these factors, the surgery and anaesthesia were standardized and performed by persons blinded to the treatment allocation. Our study confirms that abdominal hysterectomy offers a valid and reproducible means of studying the stress response. The results of this study, however, may not be extrapolated to situations with a more extensive inflammatory stimulus such as major trauma, ischaemia/reperfusion, or massive bleeding.
In conclusion, this study shows that infusion of a clinically relevant dose of hypertonic saline before abdominal hysterectomy appears to have limited effect on the postoperative concentration of selected plasma cytokines and the hormonal stress-response.
| Funding |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Western Danish Research Forum for Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus; The Danish Medical Association Research Fund, Copenhagen; The Danish Biotechnology Program (all in Denmark); and The Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, Stavanger, Norway.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Niels Juel Christensen, MD, DMSc, Professor; Søren Rittig, MD, DMSc; Erland J. Erlandsen, MSC, and Bodil Andersen are thanked for their support.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth (2000) 85:109–17.
2 Angele MK, Faist E. Clinical review: immunodepression in the surgical patient and increased susceptibility to infection. Crit Care (2002) 6:298–305.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3 Jarvela K, Koskinen M, Koobi T. Effects of hypertonic saline (7.5%) on extracellular fluid volumes in healthy volunteers. Anaesthesia (2003) 58:878–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4 Kramer GC. Hypertonic resuscitation: physiologic mechanisms and recommendations for trauma care. J Trauma (2003) 54:S89–99.[Web of Science][Medline]
5 Kolsen-Petersen JA. Immune effect of hypertonic saline: fact or fiction? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (2004) 48:667–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 Wade CE, Hannon JP, Bossone CA, et al. Neuroendocrine responses to hypertonic saline/dextran resuscitation following hemorrhage. Circ Shock (1991) 35:37–43.[Web of Science][Medline]
7 Gushchin V, Alam HB, Rhee P, Kirkpatrick JR, Koustova E. cDNA profiling in leukocytes exposed to hypertonic resuscitation fluids. J Am Coll Surg (2003) 197:426–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 Oreopoulos GD, Wu H, Szaszi K, et al. Hypertonic preconditioning prevents hepatocellular injury following ischemia/reperfusion in mice: a role for interleukin 10. Hepatology (2004) 40:211–20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
9 Oreopoulos GD, Bradwell S, Lu Z, et al. Synergistic induction of IL-10 by hypertonic saline solution and lipopolysaccharides in murine peritoneal macrophages. Surgery (2001) 130:157–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 Hatanaka E, Shimomi FM, Curi R, Campa A. Sodium chloride inhibits cytokine production by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human neutrophils and mononuclear cells. Shock (2007) 27:32–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 Powers KA, Woo J, Khadaroo RG, Papia G, Kapus A, Rotstein OD. Hypertonic resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock upregulates the anti-inflammatory response by alveolar macrophages. Surgery (2003) 134:312–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12 Horton JW, Maass DL, White J, Sanders B. Hypertonic saline-dextran suppresses burn-related cytokine secretion by cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2001) 280:H1591–601.
13 Boldt J, Knothe C, Zickmann B, Hammermann H, Stertmann WA, Hempelmann G. Volume loading with hypertonic saline solution: endocrinologic and circulatory responses. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth (1994) 8:317–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 Rizoli SB, Rhind SG, Shek PN, et al. The immunomodulatory effects of hypertonic saline resuscitation in patients sustaining traumatic hemorrhagic shock: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. Ann Surg (2006) 243:47–57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15 Bulger EM, Cuschieri J, Warner K, Maier RV. Hypertonic resuscitation modulates the inflammatory response in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Ann Surg (2007) 245:635–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16 Kolsen-Petersen JA, Nielsen JO, Bendtzen K, Tonnesen E. Infusion of hypertonic saline (7.5% NaCl) causes minor immunological changes in normovolaemic women. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (2004) 48:224–33.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17 Kolsen-Petersen JA, Nielsen JO, Tonnesen EM. Effect of hypertonic saline infusion on postoperative cellular immune function: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Anesthesiology (2004) 100:1108–18.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18 Kompanowska-Jezierska E, Emmeluth C, Grove L, Christensen P, Sadowski J, Bie P. Mechanism of vasopressin natriuresis in the dog: role of vasopressin receptors and prostaglandins. Am J Physiol (1998) 274:R1619–25.[Web of Science][Medline]
19 Knudsen JH, Christensen NJ, Bratholm P. Lymphocyte norepinephrine and epinephrine, but not plasma catecholamines predict lymphocyte cAMP production. Life Sci (1996) 59:639–47.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
20 Svenson M, Hansen MB, Heegaard P, Abell K, Bendtzen K. Specific binding of interleukin 1 (IL-1) beta and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) to human serum. High-affinity binding of IL-1ra to soluble IL-1 receptor type I. Cytokine (1993) 5:427–35.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21 Parkin J, Cohen B. An overview of the immune system. Lancet (2001) 357:1777–89.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22 Bahrami S, Zimmermann K, Szelenyi Z, et al. Small-volume fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline prevents inflammation but not mortality in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock. Shock (2006) 25:283–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 Gebhard F, Pfetsch H, Steinbach G, Strecker W, Kinzl L, Bruckner UB. Is interleukin 6 an early marker of injury severity following major trauma in humans? Arch Surg (2000) 135:291–5.
24 Lin E, Calvano SE, Lowry SF. Inflammatory cytokines and cell response in surgery. Surgery (2000) 127:117–26.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25 Shapiro L, Dinarello CA. Osmotic regulation of cytokine synthesis in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1995) 92:12230–4.
26 Shapiro L, Dinarello CA. Hyperosmotic stress as a stimulant for proinflammatory cytokine production. Exp Cell Res (1997) 231:354–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
27 Farquhar WB, Wenner MM, Delaney EP, Prettyman AV, Stillabower ME. Sympathetic neural responses to increased osmolality in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2006) 291:H2181–6.
28 Lindqvist M, Melcher A, Hjemdahl P. Flow dependence of forearm noradrenaline overflow, as assessed during mental stress and sodium nitroprusside infusion. J Hypertens (1999) 17:91–7.[Medline]
29 Waters JH, Gottlieb A, Schoenwald P, Popovich MJ, Sprung J, Nelson DR. Normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution for intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an outcome study. Anesth Analg (2001) 93:817–22.
30 Takil A, Eti Z, Irmak P, Yilmaz GF. Early postoperative respiratory acidosis after large intravascular volume infusion of lactated Ringer's solution during major spine surgery. Anesth Analg (2002) 95:294–8. table.
31 Cross JS, Gruber DP, Gann DS, Singh AK, Moran JM, Burchard KW. Hypertonic saline attenuates the hormonal response to injury. Ann Surg (1989) 209:684–91. discussions 691.[Web of Science][Medline]
32 Crum R, Bobrow B, Shackford S, Hansbrough J, Brown MR. The neurohumoral response to burn injury in patients resuscitated with hypertonic saline. J Trauma (1988) 28:1181–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
33 Offner PJ, Moore EE, Ciesla D. The adrenal response after severe trauma. Am J Surg (2002) 184:649–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
34 Tonnesen E, Wahlgreen C. Influence of extradural and general anaesthesia on natural killer cell activity and lymphocyte subpopulations in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth (1988) 60:500–7.
35 Tønnesen E. Immunological aspects of anesthetic management. Adv Neuroimmunol (1993) 3:255–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P<0.05, 


