Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(6):769-771; doi:10.1093/bja/aem329
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lumb, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lumb, A. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Just a little oxygen to breathe as you go off to sleep...is it always a good idea?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Administration of oxygen 100% to patients before inducing anaesthesia provides a reserve of oxygen, mostly in the patient's functional residual capacity (FRC), to extend the time before hypoxia occurs, should there be difficulties achieving adequate ventilation after induction. Preoxygenation is now widely used, and in the operating theatres in which I work, the practice has extended beyond the anaesthetists to nursing staff and operating department practitioners, who now automatically apply a face mask to the patient while I administer the induction agents. An editorial in 2004 argued that routine preoxygenation ‘could be recommended to the profession regardless of the experience, expertise or grade of the practitioner, and mandated for trainees’.1 The author of this recommendation, and the enthusiastic theatre staff, all make the assumption that administering oxygen 100% is harmless. In his translation of the Hippocratic oath, Galen put great emphasis on the phrase primum non nocere (first, do no . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A. B. Lumb

St James's University Hospital Leeds UK

E-mail: a.lumb@leeds.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

‘routine pre-oxygenation’ – not undermined by atelectasis challenge
M D Dominic Bell
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 22 Jan 2008 [Full text]
Just a little oxygen may be good
Anthony R Lewis, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 24 Jan 2008 [Full text]
Response to "‘routine pre-oxygenation’ – not undermined by atelectasis challenge"
Andrew B Lumb
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 24 Jan 2008 [Full text]
Pre-oxygenation atelectasis – a concept still capable of harm without further refinement
M D Dominic Bell
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 12 Feb 2008 [Full text]