Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riley, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riley, E. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 4 459-461
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Editorial I

Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: keep the pressure up and don’t spare the vasoconstrictors

E. T. Riley

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

My prediction is that within the next few years we will be treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in a fundamentally different way than we have during the last 20 years. We will no longer use ephedrine as the mainstay of treatment, we will be more aggressive about maintaining arterial pressure near normal, and we will worry less (if at all) about the liberal use of other vasoconstricting drugs. In another important contribution by this group, Kee and colleagues1 provide evidence that will help us determine the optimal way for preventing the detrimental effects of maternal hypotension after induction of spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. In this study, the authors maintained maternal arterial pressure at 80%, 90% or 100% of baseline. Using umbilical artery pH as their primary outcome, they found that maintaining the arterial pressure at 100% of baseline was associated with the best outcome for the baby (highest umbilical . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. Benhamou and C. Wong
Neuraxial Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: What Criteria Define the "Optimal" Technique?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1370 - 1373.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
D. W. Cooper, S. C. Gibb, T. Meek, S. Owen, M. S. Kokri, A. T. Malik, and K. K. Koneti
Effect of intravenous vasopressor on spread of spinal anaesthesia and fetal acid-base equilibrium
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2007; 98(5): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Erkinaro, T. Kavasmaa, M. Pakkila, G. Acharya, K. Makikallio, S. Alahuhta, and J. Rasanen
Ephedrine and phenylephrine for the treatment of maternal hypotension in a chronic sheep model of increased placental vascular resistance
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2006; 96(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
N. G. Mandal, A. Gulati, K. S. Khaw, and W. Ngan Kee
Oxygen supplementation during Caesarean delivery
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2004; 93(3): 469 - 470.
[Full Text] [PDF]