Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glavin, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maran, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glavin, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maran, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002, Vol. 88, No. 3 329-330
© 2002 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Editorial

Editorial I

Development and use of scoring systems for assessment of clinical competence

R. J. Glavin and N. J. Maran

Scottish Clinical Simulation Centre Stirling Royal Infirmary Livilands Gate Stirling FK8 2AU UK

The assessment of clinical competence is one of the greatest challenges facing medicine today. A useful construct for the assessment of competence is provided in the Miller pyramid (Fig. 1).1


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 1 The Miller pyramid.

 
The first two stages, ‘knows’ and ‘knows how’, can be assessed using the traditional assessment tools of written and oral tests. However, ‘knowing’ and ‘knowing how’ clearly do not necessarily extrapolate to the application of knowledge in the workplace. To demonstrate clinical competence, assessment at levels 3 and 4 becomes more important, but also more challenging. Level 3, ‘shows how’, is currently assessed by . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. I. Fernandez, P. J. Watson, and D. J. Rowbotham
Effect of pulsed magnetic field therapy on pain reported by human volunteers in a laboratory model of acute pain
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 266 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
C A Graham
Advanced airway management in the emergency department: what are the training and skills maintenance needs for UK emergency physicians?
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 14 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Glavin and D. Greaves
The problem of coordinating simulator-based instruction with experience in the real workplace
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 309 - 311.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. A. Olympio, R. Whelan, R. P. A. Ford, and I. C. M. Saunders
Failure of simulation training to change residents' management of oesophageal intubation{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 312 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Lechner, M. G. van Wijk, A. J. Maas, F. R. van Dorsten, R. A. Drost, C. J. Langenberg, L. J. Teunissen, P. H. Cornelissen, and J. van Niekerk
Clinical Results with the Acoustic Puncture Assist Device, a New Acoustic Device to Identify the Epidural Space
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1183 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]