Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 2 185
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Editorial

Editorial III

BJA Concise — a step too far

Graham Smith

The BJA Concise was not conceived without prolonged discussions at the Board of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. The arguments in favour of moving from conception to delivery depended on simultaneous availability of the full BJA on the Internet. The advantages of the BJA Concise were believed to be: economy . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
C. S. Reilly
British Journal of Anaesthesia: enhancing the author and reader experience.
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2006; 97(4): 443 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]