Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marczin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royston, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marczin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royston, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 87, No. 2 179-183
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Editorial

Editorial I

Nitric oxide as mediator, marker and modulator of microvascular damage in ARDS

N. Marczin and D. Royston

In this issue, Stuart-Smith and Jeremy join an interesting series of international debates regarding mechanisms of microvessel damage in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in particular the role of endothelium derived relaxing factors (EDRF) in the pathophysiology and treatment of this disease.1 Their review seems to promote the idea of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor playing a primary role in ARDS whereas nitric oxide (NO), a prominent endothelium derived relaxing factor and regulator of intercellular communication, is attributed only as a minor component. The major claim of the authors, as reflected in the title, is that NO may not be the answer to microvessel damage in ARDS. This claim should certainly be investigated in the context of specific questions and in the context of our success or failure in understanding this life-threatening condition.

Do we understand the biology of ARDS?

The main characteristics of ARDS is non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema and a mild degree of hypertension that results from acute . . . [Full Text of this Article]

NO as regulator of pulmonary function and mediator of lung injury

NO as a marker of lung injury

NO as modulator of lung injury

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Marczin, T. Kovesis, D. Royston, B. H. Cuthbertson, S. A. Stott, and N. R. Webster
Exhaled nitric oxide as a marker of lung injury in coronary artery bypass surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2003; 90(1): 101 - 105.
[Full Text] [PDF]