Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, D.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menon, D.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 5 607-617
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Editorial

Editorial I

Mapping the anatomy of unconsciousness—imaging anaesthetic action in the brain

D.M. Menon

The issue of how and where general anaesthetics act in the brain continues to intrigue and occupy researchers. Studies that address these issues can be focused at different levels. One reductionist approach is to investigate anaesthetic interactions with specific receptors or other molecular targets in a variety of models.16 While such studies are important, they are difficult to interpret in the context of functional neuroanatomical models of consciousness.7 8 An alternative approach is to consider the differential effects of anaesthesia on different brain areas, with a view to identifying specific brain regions that are important for anaesthesia (and by inference, for the generation of consciousness).

 Such an assessment of spatial variations in general anaesthetic effects in the brain is not easy. While clinical measurement of anaesthetic effect has substantially depended on measuring spontaneous or evoked electrical responses,7 current implementations cannot provide the tomographic visualization of subcortical physiology required to understand sites . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.-W. Ying and P. A. Goldstein
Propofol-Block of SK Channels in Reticular Thalamic Neurons Enhances GABAergic Inhibition in Relay Neurons
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1935 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. A. Veselis, V. A. Feshchenko, R. A. Reinsel, A. M. Dnistrian, B. Beattie, and T. J. Akhurst
Thiopental and Propofol Affect Different Regions of the Brain at Similar Pharmacologic Effects
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 399 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
W. Heinke and C. Schwarzbauer
In vivo imaging of anaesthetic action in humans: approaches with positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 112 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Vahle-Hinz and O. Detsch
What can in vivo electrophysiology in animal models tell us about mechanisms of anaesthesia?
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 123 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]