Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 1 3-4
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Editorial

Editorial II

Publishing changes in 2001

Graham Smith

Peer-reviewed journals that are predominantly archival tend to be viewed as rather conservative and staid organs but they do provide an accurate reflection of changes in modes of communication and they adapt, at varying speeds, to meet the needs of the audiences which the journals are designed to serve.

From its inception in 1923 until 1995, the sole method by which the British Journal of Anaesthesia conveyed information to subscribers was via the printed page. However, in the last decade, there have been two significant changes in our modus operandi. In 1995, material was distributed on a CD–ROM and, since July 2000, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?