Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 102(6):NP; doi:10.1093/bja/aep132
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Board of Directors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

In the June 2009 BJA ...

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Failed spinal anaesthesia

Spinals are an effective and frequently used technique in anaesthetic practice. However, inadequate or ‘failed’ blocks do occur and various series have described a range of incidence from <0.5% to over 17%. Several articles in this month's issue address . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BJA:

Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention
P. D. W. Fettes, J.-R. Jansson, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
BJA 2009 102: 739-748. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Bupivacaine concentrations in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients during spinal anaesthesia
W. Ruppen, L. A. Steiner, J. Drewe, L. Hauenstein, S. Brugger, and M. D. Seeberger
BJA 2009 102: 832-838. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Bupivacaine concentrations in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in patients with failed spinal anaesthesia
L. A. Steiner, L. Hauenstein, W. Ruppen, K. F. Hampl, and M. D. Seeberger
BJA 2009 102: 839-844. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Spinal anaesthesia: a century of refinement, and failure is still an option
K. Drasner
BJA 2009 102: 729-730. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
A. A. El-Dawlatly, A. Turkistani, S. C. Kettner, A.-M. Machata, M. B. Delvi, A. Thallaj, S. Kapral, and P. Marhofer
BJA 2009 102: 763-767. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique
M. K. Karmakar, X. Li, A. M.-H. Ho, W. H. Kwok, and P. T. Chui
BJA 2009 102: 845-854. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients
H. S. Na, J. T. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. H. Bahk, C. S. Kim, and S. D. Kim
BJA 2009 102: 820-823. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Motivational influences on anaesthetists’ use of practice guidelines
D. L. Phipps, P. C. W. Beatty, D. Parker, C. Nsoedo, and G. H. Meakin
BJA 2009 102: 768-774. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Challenge of improving postoperative pain management: case studies of three acute pain services in the UK National Health Service
A. E. Powell, H. T. O. Davies, J. Bannister, and W. A. Macrae
BJA 2009 102: 824-831. [Abstract] [Full Text]