Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009 102(6):731-734; doi:10.1093/bja/aep100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A.
Right arrow Articles by Swanevelder, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A.
Right arrow Articles by Swanevelder, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Board of Directors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournal.org

Perioperative echocardiography for non-cardiac surgery: what is its role in routine haemodynamic monitoring?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Perioperative echocardiography enables direct visualization of the chambers of the heart, its valves, and the major connecting vessels (aorta, pulmonary artery, pulmonary veins, and vena cavae). Many aspects of cardiac function may be measured and monitored by transoesophageal (TOE) and transthoracic (TTE) echocardiography. In cardiac anaesthesia, echocardiography has become an established imaging modality.1 With recent proposed changes in training, the goalposts for perioperative echocardiography appear to have extended to include non-cardiac surgery.2 This Editorial examines the feasibility of using perioperative echocardiography in routine non-cardiac practice. It adopts a framework similar to that for diagnostic tests in the laboratory,3 that is to say, clinical validity (the ability to detect presence or absence of disease), clinical usefulness (does the test lead to better patient outcomes?), safety, education, and economics.

The validity of TOE as a monitor may be illustrated using a model of infective endocarditis in which multiple structural abnormalities, for example, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A. Ng1,* and J. Swanevelder2

1 Heart and Lung Centre
Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals
NHS Trust and University of Birmingham
West Midlands
UK
2 University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester
UK

* E-mail: Alexander.Ng@rwh-tr.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Transthoracic Echocardiography - Still A Useful Tool in Risk Stratification
Tim J Dawes, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 16 Jul 2009 [Full text]
Controversies in perioperative echocardiography for non-cardiac surgery
Alexander Ng, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 18 Aug 2009 [Full text]