Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on January 12, 2009

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen360
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Chinese eTranslation
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/179    most recent
aen360v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists{dagger}

T. M. Cook1,*, D. Counsell2, J. A. W. Wildsmith3 on behalf of The Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, UK
2 Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
3 University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: timcook007{at}googlemail.com

Background: Serious complications of central neuraxial block (CNB) are rare. Limited information on their incidence and impact impedes clinical decision-making and patient consent. The Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project was designed to inform this situation.

Methods: A 2 week national census estimated the number of CNB procedures performed annually in the UK National Health Service. All major complications of CNBs performed over 1 yr (vertebral canal abscess or haematoma, meningitis, nerve injury, spinal cord ischaemia, fatal cardiovascular collapse, and wrong route errors) were reported. Each case was reviewed by an expert panel to assess causation, severity, and outcome. ‘Permanent’ injury was defined as symptoms persisting for more than 6 months. Efforts were made to validate denominator (procedures performed) and numerator (complications) data through national databases.

Results: The census phase produced a denominator of 707 455 CNB. Eighty-four major complications were reported, of which 52 met the inclusion criteria at the time they were reported. Data were interpreted ‘pessimistically’ and ‘optimistically’. ‘Pessimistically’ there were 30 permanent injuries and ‘optimistically’ 14. The incidence of permanent injury due to CNB (expressed per 100 000 cases) was ‘pessimistically’ 4.2 (95% confidence interval 2.9–6.1) and ‘optimistically’ 2.0 (1.1–3.3). ‘Pessimistically’ there were 13 deaths or paraplegias, ‘optimistically’ five. The incidence of paraplegia or death was ‘pessimistically’ 1.8 per 100 000 (1.0–3.1) and ‘optimistically’ 0.7 (0–1.6). Two-thirds of initially disabling injuries resolved fully.

Conclusions: The data are reassuring and suggest that CNB has a low incidence of major complications, many of which resolve within 6 months.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, epidural; anaesthetic techniques, subarachnoid; anaesthetic techniques, regional, caudal; audit; complications, death; complications, neurological


{dagger} This article is accompanied by Editorial I.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. R. Bodenham and S. J. Howell
General anaesthesia vs local anaesthesia: an ongoing story
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(6): 785 - 789.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Scott, J. Stones, N. Payne, T. M. Cook, B. Fischer, D. Bogod, J. A. Wildsmith, D. Counsell, I. Christie, and M. Damien
Antiseptic solutions for central neuraxial blockade: which concentration of chlorhexidine in alcohol should we use?
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 456 - 457.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Choi and R. Brull
Neuraxial Techniques in Obstetric and Non-Obstetric Patients with Common Bleeding Diatheses
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 648 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
V. Moen, L. Irestedt, N. Dahlgren, T. M. Cook, D. Counsell, and J. A. Wildsmith
Major complications of central neuraxial block: the Third National Audit Project: some comments and questions
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 130 - 132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Boye and J. Schumacher
Diagnosis of vertebral canal haematoma by myelography and spiral computer tomography in a patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 137 - 138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. J. Fowler, T. M. Cook, D. Counsell, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Incidence of severe complications after central neuraxial block
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 882 - 883.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. M. Grounds, T. M. Cook, D. Counsell, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Is the outcome for central neuraxial blockade really reassuring?
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2009; 102(5): 714 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. J. Buggy
Central neuraxial block: defining risk more clearly
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2009; 102(2): 151 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Incidence of severe complications after centroneuraxial block
Steven J Fowler
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Is the outcome for central neuraxial blockade really reassuring?
R Michael Grounds
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 20 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Re: Incidence of severe complications after centroneuraxial block
Tim Cook, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 20 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Concerns regarding the infectious complications of neuraxial block
Prasad K Narasimha
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 25 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Re: Concerns regarding the infectious complications of neuraxial block
Tim M Cook
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2 Mar 2009 [Full text]
Re: Is the outcome for central neuraxial blockade really reassuring?
Tim M Cook
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2 Mar 2009 [Full text]
Antiseptic solutions for central neuraxial blockade – which concentration of chlorhexidine in alcohol should we use?
Michael J Scott, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 11 May 2009 [Full text]
Re: Antiseptic solutions for central neuraxial blockade – which concentration of chlorhexidine in alcohol should we use?
Tim M Cook, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 16 Jun 2009 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.