Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access first published online on August 23, 2008
This version published online on August 29, 2008

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen248
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/680    most recent
aen248v2
aen248v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anand, K. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anand, K. J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Morphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in preterm and term neonates: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial

K. J. S. Anand1,*, B. J. Anderson2, N. H. G. Holford3, R. W. Hall1, T. Young4, B. Shephard5, N. S. Desai6, B. A. Barton7 for the NEOPAIN Trial Investigators Group

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
2 Division of Anaesthesiology
3 Division of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
4 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Wake Medical Center, Raleigh, NC, USA
5 Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
6 University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
7 Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA

* Corresponding author: Arkansas Children's Hospital, Rm S-4417, 800 Marshall Street, Slot 900, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA. E-mail: anandsunny{at}uams.edu

Background: Relationships between plasma morphine concentrations and neonatal responses to endotracheal tube (ETT) suctioning are unknown in preterm neonates.

Methods: Ventilated preterm neonates (n=898) from 16 centres were randomly assigned to placebo (n=449) or morphine (n=449). After an i.v. loading dose (100 µg kg–1), morphine infusions [23–26 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) 10 µg kg–1 h–1; 27–29 weeks 20 µg kg–1 h–1; and 30–32 weeks 30 µg kg–1 h–1] were established for a maximum of 14 days. Open-label morphine (20–100 µg kg–1) was given for pain or agitation. Morphine assay and neonatal response to ETT suctioning was measured at 20–28 and 70–76 h after starting the drug infusion and at 10–14 h after discontinuation of the study drug. The concentration–effect response was investigated using non-linear mixed effects models.

Results: A total of 5119 data points (1598 measured morphine concentrations and 3521 effect measures) were available from 875 neonates for analysis. Clearance was 50% that of the mature value at 54.2 weeks PMA (CLmat50) and increased from 2.05 litre h–1 70 kg–1 at 24 weeks PMA to 6.04 litre h–1 70 kg–1 at 32 weeks PMA. The volume of distribution in preterm neonates was 190 litre 70 kg–1 (CV 51%) and did not change with age. There was no relationship between morphine concentrations (range 0–440 µg litre–1) and heart rate changes associated with ETT suctioning or with the Premature Infant Pain Profile.

Conclusions: A sigmoid curve describing maturation of morphine clearance is moved to the right in preterm neonates and volume of distribution is increased compared with term neonates. Morphine does not alter the neonatal response to ETT suctioning.

Keywords: anaesthesia, paediatric; anaesthetic–analgesic regimens; analgesics opioid, morphine; model, pharmacodynamic; model, pharmacokinetic


This is a new version as there was an error in the first paragraph of the ‘Age-related changes’ section of the Methods.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.